From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from qb-out-0506.google.com (qb-out-0506.google.com [72.14.204.237]) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBDAEDE0B4 for ; Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:52:16 +1100 (EST) Received: by qb-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id a16so4449236qbd.39 for ; Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:52:14 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: pku.leo@gmail.com In-Reply-To: References: <20090111153013.GA31791@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru> <3A45394FD742FA419B760BB8D398F9ED13DD10@zch01exm26.fsl.freescale.net> Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2009 13:52:14 +0800 Message-ID: <2a27d3730901122152q33580942se37c5bb8d515ddbc@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc/83xx: Make serial ports work on MPC8315E-RDB w/FSL U-Boots From: Li Yang To: Kumar Gala Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mon, Jan 12, 2009 at 11:07 PM, Kumar Gala wrote: > > On Jan 12, 2009, at 1:55 AM, Li Yang wrote: > >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@ozlabs.org >>> [mailto:linuxppc-dev-bounces+leoli=freescale.com@ozlabs.org] >>> On Behalf Of Anton Vorontsov >>> Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2009 11:30 PM >>> To: Kumar Gala >>> Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org >>> Subject: [PATCH] powerpc/83xx: Make serial ports work on >>> MPC8315E-RDB w/FSL U-Boots >>> >>> FSL U-Boots use /soc8315@e0000000 node to search and fixup >>> serial nodes' clock-frequency properties. Though in upstream >>> kernels we use new naming convention -- for IMMR address >>> space dts files specify /immr@e0000000 nodes. >>> >>> This makes FSL U-Boots fail to fixup the clock frequencies, >>> and that leads to serial ports misbehaviour. We can >>> workaround the issue by filling the clock frequency values manually. >> >> Freescale BSP is for customer who needs the out-of-box experience. It's >> better tested, but doesn't update very frequently. I would suggest the >> customer to use the upstream u-boot, if they decide to use latest >> upstream kernel. >> >> - Leo > > Agreed. However I don't think there is any harm w/the patch as upstream > u-boot will update the property. You are right. There will be no harm as upstream u-boot can update the DTS of old binding. - Leo