From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2CE9C433EF for ; Fri, 3 Dec 2021 17:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4J5Klw0Zw7z3cFf for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 04:37:48 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Yr7TRkzR; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com (client-ip=2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3; helo=bhuna.collabora.co.uk; envelope-from=ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=mail header.b=Yr7TRkzR; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from bhuna.collabora.co.uk (bhuna.collabora.co.uk [IPv6:2a00:1098:0:82:1000:25:2eeb:e3e3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4J5KlC5pKMz2xtZ for ; Sat, 4 Dec 2021 04:37:11 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from [127.0.0.1] (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (Authenticated sender: adalessandro) with ESMTPSA id 3E02E1F40F12 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1638553029; bh=6DQqd6PdWjbwATYc5OwpxooTIyDGyjPYpNpe0Obs3Sc=; h=Subject:To:Cc:References:From:Date:In-Reply-To:From; b=Yr7TRkzR/0XKIud0HXHmtfb1p9HPCeObqRIBjA9PgYseBSC92kOQLiCRUFZMwkVA/ pxUJyDEdierMw6v4Y+mrSnE5uXBJQEmILlMdiy47sBKNu1JMp4JL1I2VIjmQSwkbZR s6XqUQEWOwIp9sHjSaKSGoyF4wSTsUN6GoymFrRFBBcHFCtBt2QIClg4RNUCW/ZMkd 6SnXkfc3addcXm8oNwu0b9euYjERQZMbBdJqBKN3c1djj6GEbdTixaqf8r2xM+fjN5 95qyx6k9h5kyKQQhtlUUQUmVNDbWy0hHsIfcqvMP0hJzAP0KJjYWYYopRazNyARIA1 9Mvv8TyrSfbIg== Subject: Re: [RFC patch 0/5] Support BCLK input clock in tlv320aic31xx To: Mark Brown References: <20211119153248.419802-1-ariel.dalessandro@collabora.com> <163762561675.2471742.16439171676950432106.b4-ty@kernel.org> <6a2ff1f0-ebd9-be6d-9b2c-5704edd7c25d@collabora.com> From: Ariel D'Alessandro Message-ID: <2a79ca46-74b7-4add-912e-d687cee825a7@collabora.com> Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2021 14:37:00 -0300 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.11.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, lgirdwood@gmail.com, kuninori.morimoto.gx@renesas.com, Xiubo.Lee@gmail.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, shengjiu.wang@gmail.com, tiwai@suse.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, perex@perex.cz, nicoleotsuka@gmail.com, bkylerussell@gmail.com, michael@amarulasolutions.com, festevam@gmail.com Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" Hi Mark, On 12/3/21 2:34 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > On Fri, Dec 03, 2021 at 02:25:17PM -0300, Ariel D'Alessandro wrote: >> On 11/22/21 9:00 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > >>> If any updates are required or you are submitting further changes they >>> should be sent as incremental updates against current git, existing >>> patches will not be replaced. > >> I gotta send a fix for one of the patches. So, should it be a new >> incremental patch or I can still send a patchset v2? > > See above. Got it, thank you for confirming it.