From: Shilpasri G Bhat <shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@roeck-us.net>
Cc: mpe@ellerman.id.au, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] Add support to disable sensor groups in P9
Date: Thu, 17 May 2018 11:40:35 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2ceb6b30-60b7-d985-ee0d-6c5784eda273@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20180515150205.GA29321@roeck-us.net>
On 05/15/2018 08:32 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2018 at 04:24:32PM +0530, Shilpasri G Bhat wrote:
>> This patch series adds support to enable/disable OCC based
>> inband-sensor groups at runtime. The environmental sensor groups are
>> managed in HWMON and the remaining platform specific sensor groups are
>> managed in /sys/firmware/opal.
>>
>> The firmware changes required for this patch is posted below:
>> https://lists.ozlabs.org/pipermail/skiboot/2018-March/010812.html
>>
>
> Sorry for not getting back earlier. This is a tough one.
>
Thanks for the reply. I have tried to answer your questions according to my
understanding below:
> Key problem is that you are changing the ABI with those new attributes.
> On top of that, the attributes _do_ make some sense (many chips support
> enabling/disabling of individual sensors), suggesting that those or
> similar attributes may or even should at some point be added to the ABI.
>
> At the same time, returning "0" as measurement values when sensors are
> disabled does not seem like a good idea, since "0" is a perfectly valid
> measurement, at least for most sensors.
I agree.
>
> Given that, we need to have a discussion about adding _enable attributes to
> the ABI
> what is the scope,
IIUC the scope should be RW and the attribute is defined for each supported
sensor group
> when should the attributes exist and when not,
We control this currently via device-tree
> do we want/need power_enable or powerX_enable or both, and so on), and
We need power_enable right now
> what to return if a sensor is disabled (such as -ENODATA).
-ENODATA sounds good.
Thanks and Regards,
Shilpa
Once we have an
> agreement, we can continue with an implementation.
>
> Guenter
>
>> Shilpasri G Bhat (3):
>> powernv:opal-sensor-groups: Add support to enable sensor groups
>> hwmon: ibmpowernv: Add attributes to enable/disable sensor groups
>> powernv: opal-sensor-groups: Add attributes to disable/enable sensors
>>
>> .../ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-opal-sensor-groups | 34 ++++++
>> Documentation/hwmon/ibmpowernv | 31 ++++-
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal-api.h | 4 +-
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/opal.h | 2 +
>> .../powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-sensor-groups.c | 104 ++++++++++++-----
>> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/opal-wrappers.S | 1 +
>> drivers/hwmon/ibmpowernv.c | 127 +++++++++++++++++++--
>> 7 files changed, 265 insertions(+), 38 deletions(-)
>> create mode 100644 Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-firmware-opal-sensor-groups
>>
>> --
>> 1.8.3.1
>>
>> --
>> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-hwmon" in
>> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
>> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-17 6:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-03-22 10:54 [PATCH 0/3] Add support to disable sensor groups in P9 Shilpasri G Bhat
2018-03-22 10:54 ` [PATCH 1/3] powernv:opal-sensor-groups: Add support to enable sensor groups Shilpasri G Bhat
2018-03-22 10:54 ` [PATCH 2/3] hwmon: ibmpowernv: Add attributes to enable/disable " Shilpasri G Bhat
2018-03-22 10:54 ` [PATCH 3/3] powernv: opal-sensor-groups: Add attributes to disable/enable sensors Shilpasri G Bhat
2018-05-15 15:02 ` [PATCH 0/3] Add support to disable sensor groups in P9 Guenter Roeck
2018-05-17 6:10 ` Shilpasri G Bhat [this message]
2018-05-17 12:38 ` Guenter Roeck
2018-05-18 4:03 ` Shilpasri G Bhat
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2ceb6b30-60b7-d985-ee0d-6c5784eda273@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--to=shilpa.bhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@roeck-us.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=stewart@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).