From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5FD13C11D2F for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DBB3B2072D for ; Mon, 24 Feb 2020 15:37:48 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DBB3B2072D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48R5mV0Zf9zDqWs for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:37:46 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=permerror (SPF Permanent Error: Unknown mechanism found: ip:192.40.192.88/32) smtp.mailfrom=kernel.crashing.org (client-ip=76.164.61.194; helo=kernel.crashing.org; envelope-from=benh@kernel.crashing.org; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=kernel.crashing.org Received: from kernel.crashing.org (kernel.crashing.org [76.164.61.194]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48R5k75tjQzDqDt for ; Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:34:15 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from localhost (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (authenticated bits=0) by kernel.crashing.org (8.14.7/8.14.7) with ESMTP id 01OFY1FI026951 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Mon, 24 Feb 2020 09:34:04 -0600 Message-ID: <2df70550695143a9b62c0146e8e3e17ac91c1863.camel@kernel.crashing.org> Subject: Re: vdso function descriptors (VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS)? From: Benjamin Herrenschmidt To: Joe Lawrence , Segher Boessenkool Date: Tue, 25 Feb 2020 02:34:00 +1100 In-Reply-To: <885be270-7af8-490d-302c-270a6db94ffe@redhat.com> References: <20200217160852.GA9557@redhat.com> <20200223000715.GW22482@gate.crashing.org> <587a0a1765ba1264b92044f7b1f9937eb40731f1.camel@kernel.crashing.org> <885be270-7af8-490d-302c-270a6db94ffe@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On Mon, 2020-02-24 at 10:20 -0500, Joe Lawrence wrote: > On > > I don't remember why :-) I think I didn't want to mess with the OPD > > fixup in glibc back then. > > > > Does it make sense to just drop the unused VDS64_HAS_DESCRIPTORS code > then? I'd think so yes. Cheers, Ben.