linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
Cc: John Allen <jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Nathan Fontenot <nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v06 1/9] hotplug/cpu: Conditionally acquire/release DRC index
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2018 10:54:13 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3009a3a1-0d67-a9f0-0673-8827c632c46c@linux.vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1531324062.imrh0yfelc.naveen@linux.ibm.com>

See below.  Code cleanups accepted for next revision.

On 07/11/2018 11:00 AM, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Michael Bringmann wrote:
>> powerpc/cpu: Modify dlpar_cpu_add and dlpar_cpu_remove to allow the
>> skipping of DRC index acquire or release operations during the CPU
>> add or remove operations.  This is intended to support subsequent
>> changes to provide a 'CPU readd' operation.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michael Bringmann <mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> Changes in patch:
>>   -- Move new validity check added to pseries_smp_notifier
>>      to another patch
>> ---
>>  arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c |   68 +++++++++++++++-----------
>>  1 file changed, 39 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> index 6ef77ca..3632db2 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-cpu.c
>> @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@ static bool valid_cpu_drc_index(struct device_node *parent, u32 drc_index)
>>      return found;
>>  }
>>
>> -static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_add(u32 drc_index)
>> +static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_add(u32 drc_index, bool acquire_drc)
>>  {
>>      struct device_node *dn, *parent;
>>      int rc, saved_rc;
>> @@ -457,19 +457,22 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_add(u32 drc_index)
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>      }
>>
>> -    rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(drc_index);
>> -    if (rc) {
>> -        pr_warn("Failed to acquire DRC, rc: %d, drc index: %x\n",
>> -            rc, drc_index);
>> -        of_node_put(parent);
>> -        return -EINVAL;
>> +    if (acquire_drc) {
>> +        rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(drc_index);
>> +        if (rc) {
>> +            pr_warn("Failed to acquire DRC, rc: %d, drc index: %x\n",
>> +                rc, drc_index);
>> +            of_node_put(parent);
>> +            return -EINVAL;
>> +        }
>>      }
>>
>>      dn = dlpar_configure_connector(cpu_to_be32(drc_index), parent);
>>      if (!dn) {
>>          pr_warn("Failed call to configure-connector, drc index: %x\n",
>>              drc_index);
>> -        dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
>> +        if (acquire_drc)
>> +            dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
>>          of_node_put(parent);
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>      }
>> @@ -484,8 +487,9 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_add(u32 drc_index)
>>          pr_warn("Failed to attach node %s, rc: %d, drc index: %x\n",
>>              dn->name, rc, drc_index);
>>
>> -        rc = dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
>> -        if (!rc)
>> +        if (acquire_drc)
>> +            rc = dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
>> +        if (!rc || acquire_drc)
>>              dlpar_free_cc_nodes(dn);
> 
> (!rc) can only be true if acquire_drc is true, so we seem to be only invoking dlpar_free_cc_nodes() if acquire_drc is true. Would it be better to frame that condition in this manner:
> 
>     if (acquire_drc) {
>         rc = dlpar_release_drc(drc_index):
>         if (!rc)
>             dlpar_free_cc_nodes(dn);
>     }
> 

Okay.

>>
>>          return saved_rc;
>> @@ -498,7 +502,7 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_add(u32 drc_index)
>>              dn->name, rc, drc_index);
>>
>>          rc = dlpar_detach_node(dn);
>> -        if (!rc)
>> +        if (!rc && acquire_drc)
>>              dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
>>
>>          return saved_rc;
>> @@ -566,7 +570,8 @@ static int dlpar_offline_cpu(struct device_node *dn)
>>
>>  }
>>
>> -static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_remove(struct device_node *dn, u32 drc_index)
>> +static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_remove(struct device_node *dn, u32 drc_index,
>> +                bool release_drc)
>>  {
>>      int rc;
>>
>> @@ -579,12 +584,14 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_remove(struct device_node *dn, u32 drc_index)
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>      }
>>
>> -    rc = dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
>> -    if (rc) {
>> -        pr_warn("Failed to release drc (%x) for CPU %s, rc: %d\n",
>> -            drc_index, dn->name, rc);
>> -        dlpar_online_cpu(dn);
>> -        return rc;
>> +    if (release_drc) {
>> +        rc = dlpar_release_drc(drc_index);
>> +        if (rc) {
>> +            pr_warn("Failed to release drc (%x) for CPU %s, rc: %d\n",
>> +                drc_index, dn->name, rc);
>> +            dlpar_online_cpu(dn);
>> +            return rc;
>> +        }
>>      }
>>
>>      rc = dlpar_detach_node(dn);
>> @@ -593,7 +600,10 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_remove(struct device_node *dn, u32 drc_index)
>>
>>          pr_warn("Failed to detach CPU %s, rc: %d", dn->name, rc);
>>
>> -        rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(drc_index);
>> +        if (release_drc)
>> +            rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(drc_index);
>> +        else
>> +            rc = 0;
>>          if (!rc)
>>              dlpar_online_cpu(dn);
> 
> Here, we seem to want to invoke dlpar_online_cpu() unconditionally if release_drc is false. So, to make that explicit, would it be better to frame that as:
>     if (release_drc)
>         rc = dlpar_acquire_drc(drc_index);
>     if (!release_drc || !rc)
>         dlpar_online_cpu(dn);
> 
> - Naveen

Okay.

> 
>>
>> @@ -622,7 +632,7 @@ static struct device_node *cpu_drc_index_to_dn(u32 drc_index)
>>      return dn;
>>  }
>>
>> -static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index)
>> +static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index, bool release_drc)
>>  {
>>      struct device_node *dn;
>>      int rc;
>> @@ -634,7 +644,7 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(u32 drc_index)
>>          return -ENODEV;
>>      }
>>
>> -    rc = dlpar_cpu_remove(dn, drc_index);
>> +    rc = dlpar_cpu_remove(dn, drc_index, release_drc);
>>      of_node_put(dn);
>>      return rc;
>>  }
>> @@ -699,7 +709,7 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_count(u32 cpus_to_remove)
>>      }
>>
>>      for (i = 0; i < cpus_to_remove; i++) {
>> -        rc = dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(cpu_drcs[i]);
>> +        rc = dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(cpu_drcs[i], true);
>>          if (rc)
>>              break;
>>
>> @@ -710,7 +720,7 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_remove_by_count(u32 cpus_to_remove)
>>          pr_warn("CPU hot-remove failed, adding back removed CPUs\n");
>>
>>          for (i = 0; i < cpus_removed; i++)
>> -            dlpar_cpu_add(cpu_drcs[i]);
>> +            dlpar_cpu_add(cpu_drcs[i], true);
>>
>>          rc = -EINVAL;
>>      } else {
>> @@ -780,7 +790,7 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add)
>>      }
>>
>>      for (i = 0; i < cpus_to_add; i++) {
>> -        rc = dlpar_cpu_add(cpu_drcs[i]);
>> +        rc = dlpar_cpu_add(cpu_drcs[i], true);
>>          if (rc)
>>              break;
>>
>> @@ -791,7 +801,7 @@ static int dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(u32 cpus_to_add)
>>          pr_warn("CPU hot-add failed, removing any added CPUs\n");
>>
>>          for (i = 0; i < cpus_added; i++)
>> -            dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(cpu_drcs[i]);
>> +            dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(cpu_drcs[i], true);
>>
>>          rc = -EINVAL;
>>      } else {
>> @@ -817,7 +827,7 @@ int dlpar_cpu(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
>>          if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_COUNT)
>>              rc = dlpar_cpu_remove_by_count(count);
>>          else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX)
>> -            rc = dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(drc_index);
>> +            rc = dlpar_cpu_remove_by_index(drc_index, true);
>>          else
>>              rc = -EINVAL;
>>          break;
>> @@ -825,7 +835,7 @@ int dlpar_cpu(struct pseries_hp_errorlog *hp_elog)
>>          if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_COUNT)
>>              rc = dlpar_cpu_add_by_count(count);
>>          else if (hp_elog->id_type == PSERIES_HP_ELOG_ID_DRC_INDEX)
>> -            rc = dlpar_cpu_add(drc_index);
>> +            rc = dlpar_cpu_add(drc_index, true);
>>          else
>>              rc = -EINVAL;
>>          break;
>> @@ -850,7 +860,7 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_probe(const char *buf, size_t count)
>>      if (rc)
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>
>> -    rc = dlpar_cpu_add(drc_index);
>> +    rc = dlpar_cpu_add(drc_index, true);
>>
>>      return rc ? rc : count;
>>  }
>> @@ -871,7 +881,7 @@ static ssize_t dlpar_cpu_release(const char *buf, size_t count)
>>          return -EINVAL;
>>      }
>>
>> -    rc = dlpar_cpu_remove(dn, drc_index);
>> +    rc = dlpar_cpu_remove(dn, drc_index, true);
>>      of_node_put(dn);
>>
>>      return rc ? rc : count;
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
Michael W. Bringmann
Linux Technology Center
IBM Corporation
Tie-Line  363-5196
External: (512) 286-5196
Cell:       (512) 466-0650
mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com

  reply	other threads:[~2018-07-13 15:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2018-07-09 14:57 [PATCH v06 0/9] powerpc/hotplug: Update affinity for migrated CPUs Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v06 1/9] hotplug/cpu: Conditionally acquire/release DRC index Michael Bringmann
2018-07-11 16:00   ` Naveen N. Rao
2018-07-13 15:54     ` Michael Bringmann [this message]
2018-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v06 2/9] hotplug/cpu: Add operation queuing function Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v06 3/9] hotplug/cpu: Provide CPU readd operation Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v06 4/9] mobility/numa: Ensure numa update does not overlap Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v06 5/9] numa: Disable/enable arch_update_cpu_topology Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v06 6/9] pmt/numa: Disable arch_update_cpu_topology during CPU readd Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:58 ` [PATCH v06 7/9] powerpc/rtas: Allow disabling rtas_event_scan Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:59 ` [PATCH v06 8/9] hotplug/rtas: No rtas_event_scan during PMT update Michael Bringmann
2018-07-09 14:59 ` [PATCH v06 9/9] hotplug/pmt: Update topology after PMT Michael Bringmann

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3009a3a1-0d67-a9f0-0673-8827c632c46c@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --to=mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=jallen@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tlfalcon@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=tyreld@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).