From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7996C10F26 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:32:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A55702077D for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:32:34 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org A55702077D Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 48sgw02r7ZzDqSv for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 20:32:32 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 48sgC728ljzDqJt for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 20:00:35 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0127361.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0318Y9OJ125196 for ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 05:00:31 -0400 Received: from e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com [195.75.94.98]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 304mcb5y3k-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for ; Wed, 01 Apr 2020 05:00:29 -0400 Received: from localhost by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted for from ; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:00:15 +0100 Received: from b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (9.149.109.195) by e06smtp02.uk.ibm.com (192.168.101.132) with IBM ESMTP SMTP Gateway: Authorized Use Only! Violators will be prosecuted; (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256/256) Wed, 1 Apr 2020 10:00:11 +0100 Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (mk.ibm.com [9.149.105.60]) by b06cxnps3075.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 03190KlS62259290 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:00:21 GMT Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id C5A6742056; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:00:20 +0000 (GMT) Received: from d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2E8D842041; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:00:17 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.199.48.114] (unknown [9.199.48.114]) by d06av24.portsmouth.uk.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2020 09:00:16 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 08/16] powerpc/watchpoint: Disable all available watchpoints when !dawr_force_enable To: Christophe Leroy References: <20200401061309.92442-1-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> <20200401061309.92442-9-ravi.bangoria@linux.ibm.com> <1bef7056-b862-3b20-c3b8-8b161511c60a@c-s.fr> From: Ravi Bangoria Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 14:30:16 +0530 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <1bef7056-b862-3b20-c3b8-8b161511c60a@c-s.fr> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 x-cbid: 20040109-0008-0000-0000-000003685C24 X-IBM-AV-DETECTION: SAVI=unused REMOTE=unused XFE=unused x-cbparentid: 20040109-0009-0000-0000-00004A89E3C2 Message-Id: <3042ffeb-0587-79cb-1401-070715d3adb6@linux.ibm.com> X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.138, 18.0.676 definitions=2020-03-31_07:2020-03-31, 2020-03-31 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 mlxscore=0 adultscore=0 priorityscore=1501 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 mlxlogscore=941 spamscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2003020000 definitions=main-2004010073 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: apopple@linux.ibm.com, mikey@neuling.org, Ravi Bangoria , peterz@infradead.org, oleg@redhat.com, npiggin@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, paulus@samba.org, jolsa@kernel.org, fweisbec@gmail.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, mingo@kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 4/1/20 12:03 PM, Christophe Leroy wrote: > > > Le 01/04/2020 à 08:13, Ravi Bangoria a écrit : >> Instead of disabling only first watchpoint, disable all available >> watchpoints while clearing dawr_force_enable. > > Can you also explain why you change the function name ? Right. I should have. Will add it in next version. > >> >> Signed-off-by: Ravi Bangoria >> --- >>   arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c | 10 +++++++--- >>   1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c >> index 311e51ee09f4..5c882f07ac7d 100644 >> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c >> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/dawr.c >> @@ -50,9 +50,13 @@ int set_dawr(struct arch_hw_breakpoint *brk, int nr) >>       return 0; >>   } >> -static void set_dawr_cb(void *info) >> +static void disable_dawrs(void *info) > > Wouldn't it be better to keep _cb at the end of the function ? Sure. Ravi