From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com (nommos.sslcatacombnetworking.com [67.18.224.114]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA757DDF22 for ; Fri, 23 Mar 2007 01:46:45 +1100 (EST) In-Reply-To: <1174573524.6595.509.camel@ld0161-tx32> References: <1174573524.6595.509.camel@ld0161-tx32> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v752.2) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; delsp=yes; format=flowed Message-Id: <30EF1C22-12B8-4236-8427-A78B3134F3BF@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala Subject: Re: [Fwd: [PATCH Resend 01/02] Add Linux ASMP support for MPC8641D] Date: Thu, 22 Mar 2007 09:46:08 -0500 To: Jon Loeliger Cc: "linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org" List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Mar 22, 2007, at 9:25 AM, Jon Loeliger wrote: > Kumar, > > As I indicated on IRC to you a few days ago, here is a copy > of the Asymmetric Multi-Processor support patch for 8641 HPCN. > For completeness and reference, the corresponding U-Boot patch > will be posted to the U-Boot list as well. > > This patch is directly split in two due to apparently mailer > issues with the full patch. Apologies if you have received > this patch twice. > > This is the first half of the patch, everything but the defconfig. > > Thanks, > jdl This isn't nearly as much change as I was expecting :) Can you elaborate on what the changes to mpic and gfar are doing. I assume that memory is split between the two cores. So if you have 512M of memory 0-256 is for core0 and 256-512 for core1, or do you handle this some other way (excluding the magic hw hack for exception vectors)? thanks - k