From: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
To: Hari Bathini <hbathini@linux.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, maddy@linux.ibm.com,
mpe@ellerman.id.au
Cc: npiggin@gmail.com, chleroy@kernel.org, ritesh.list@gmail.com,
shivangu@linux.ibm.com, mahesh@linux.ibm.com,
adityag@linux.ibm.com, venkat88@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/kdump: add support for high crashkernel reservation
Date: Mon, 3 Aug 2026 09:39:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30ba5292-978d-4273-9862-61ee6e96cb11@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <30f314c6-35ae-4fec-b6b4-41e57d013c75@linux.ibm.com>
On 26/07/26 16:26, Hari Bathini wrote:
>
>
> On 08/07/26 8:03 pm, Sourabh Jain wrote:
>> With this changes included crashkernel=xxM,high will be supported on
>> powerpc. This allow user to allocated crashkernel memory on higer memory
>> region and keeping the low memory allocation minimal.
>>
>> The low memory reservation is by default set to 64 MB and it is reserved
>> below RTAS_INSTANTIATE_MAX (1G) to make sure rtas instantiation work
>> properly.
>>
>> powerpc uses generic crashkernel parser and reserve functions and they
>> are capable of handling high crashkernel reservtion so
>> arch_reserve_crashkernel() is updated call generic crashkernel praser
>> and reserve function with resptive options to make
>> crashkernel=XXM,high prase and make crashkernel memory get reserved on
>> higher memory regions.
>>
>> Note: High crashkernel is supported only on PPC 64-bit systems when
>> 64-bit RTAS is instantiated and Radix MMU is enabled; otherwise, the
>> crashkernel reservation falls back to the default, even if the kernel
>> command includes crashkernel=XXM,high.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sourabh Jain <sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/crash_reserve.h | 6 ++++
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h | 1 +
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h | 9 +++++
>> arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c | 45 +++++++++++++++++-------
>> 4 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/crash_reserve.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/crash_reserve.h
>> index d1b570ddbf98..4f2096984736 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/crash_reserve.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/crash_reserve.h
>> @@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
>> #ifndef _ASM_POWERPC_CRASH_RESERVE_H
>> #define _ASM_POWERPC_CRASH_RESERVE_H
>> +#include <asm/rtas.h>
>> +
>> /* crash kernel regions are Page size agliged */
>> #define CRASH_ALIGN PAGE_SIZE
>> @@ -12,5 +14,9 @@ static inline bool arch_add_crash_res_to_iomem(void)
>> }
>> #define arch_add_crash_res_to_iomem arch_add_crash_res_to_iomem
>> #endif
>> +#define DEFAULT_CRASH_KERNEL_LOW_SIZE SZ_64M
>> +
>> +#define CRASH_ADDR_LOW_MAX RTAS_INSTANTIATE_MAX
>> +#define CRASH_ADDR_HIGH_MAX memblock_end_of_DRAM()
>> #endif /* _ASM_POWERPC_CRASH_RESERVE_H */
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h
>> index e02710d6a2e1..9e676bd3bf03 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/kexec.h
>> @@ -118,6 +118,7 @@ int setup_new_fdt_ppc64(const struct kimage
>> *image, void *fdt, struct crash_mem
>> int __init overlaps_crashkernel(unsigned long start, unsigned long
>> size);
>> extern void arch_reserve_crashkernel(void);
>> extern void kdump_cma_reserve(void);
>> +unsigned long long __init get_crash_base(unsigned long long
>> crash_base);
>> #else
>> static inline void arch_reserve_crashkernel(void) {}
>> static inline int overlaps_crashkernel(unsigned long start,
>> unsigned long size) { return 0; }
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h
>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h
>> index aaa4c3bc1d61..d290437d8131 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/rtas.h
>> @@ -561,6 +561,14 @@ static inline int page_is_rtas_user_buf(unsigned
>> long pfn)
>> return 0;
>> }
>> +static inline bool is_rtas_high_crashkernel_capable(void)
>> +{
>> + if (rtas_64)
>> + return true;
>> +
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> /* Not the best place to put pSeries_coalesce_init, will be fixed
>> when we
>> * move some of the rtas suspend-me stuff to pseries */
>> void pSeries_coalesce_init(void);
>> @@ -569,6 +577,7 @@ void rtas_initialize(void);
>> static inline int page_is_rtas_user_buf(unsigned long pfn) { return
>> 0;}
>> static inline void pSeries_coalesce_init(void) { }
>> static inline void rtas_initialize(void) { }
>
>> +static inline bool is_rtas_high_crashkernel_capable(void) { return
>> true; }
>
> Though !CONFIG_PPC_RTAS may imply radix MMU and high crashkernel
> capable, is_rtas_high_crashkernel_capable() returning true for
> !CONFIG_PPC_RTAS case seems counter-intuitive. Have a single
> generic (non-rtas specific) function that accounts for high
> crashkernel support in different scenarios?
Yeah that's a good point. Having is_rtas_high_crashkernel_capable() for
!CONFIG_PPC_RTAS
creates confusion. Single function to find high crashkernel support will
be much better.
- Sourabh Jain
>
>> #endif
>> #ifdef CONFIG_HV_PERF_CTRS
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c b/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c
>> index dc44f11be353..81fc437377c8 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kexec/core.c
>> @@ -15,6 +15,7 @@
>> #include <linux/irq.h>
>> #include <linux/ftrace.h>
>> +#include <asm/rtas.h>
>> #include <asm/kdump.h>
>> #include <asm/machdep.h>
>> #include <asm/pgalloc.h>
>> @@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ void machine_kexec(struct kimage *image)
>> static unsigned long long crashk_cma_size;
>> -static unsigned long long __init get_crash_base(unsigned long long
>> crash_base)
>> +unsigned long long __init get_crash_base(unsigned long long crash_base)
>> {
>> #ifndef CONFIG_NONSTATIC_KERNEL
>> @@ -104,35 +105,55 @@ static unsigned long long __init
>> get_crash_base(unsigned long long crash_base)
>> #endif
>> }
>> +static bool high_crashkernel_supported(void)
>> +{
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_PPC64) && (defined(CONFIG_PPC_PSERIES) ||
>> defined(CONFIG_PPC_POWERNV))
>> + if (early_radix_enabled() && is_rtas_high_crashkernel_capable())
>> + return true;
>> +#endif
>> + return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> void __init arch_reserve_crashkernel(void)
>> {
>> - unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base, crash_end;
>> + unsigned long long crash_size, crash_base, crash_end, low_size = 0;
>> unsigned long long kernel_start, kernel_size;
>> unsigned long long total_mem_sz;
>> + bool high = false;
>> int ret;
>> total_mem_sz = memory_limit ? memory_limit :
>> memblock_phys_mem_size();
>> /* use common parsing */
>> ret = parse_crashkernel(boot_command_line, total_mem_sz,
>> &crash_size,
>> - &crash_base, NULL, &crashk_cma_size, NULL);
>> + &crash_base, &low_size, &crashk_cma_size, &high);
>> if (ret)
>> return;
>> - crash_base = get_crash_base(crash_base);
>> - crash_end = crash_base + crash_size - 1;
>> + if (high && !high_crashkernel_supported()) {
>> + high = false;
>> + low_size = 0;
>> + pr_warn("High crashkernel unsupported, using standard
>> reservation");
>> + }
>> - kernel_start = __pa(_stext);
>> - kernel_size = _end - _stext;
>> + if (high) {
>> + crash_base = 0;
>> + } else {
>> + crash_base = get_crash_base(crash_base);
>> + crash_end = crash_base + crash_size - 1;
>> - /* The crash region must not overlap the current kernel */
>> - if ((kernel_start + kernel_size > crash_base) && (kernel_start
>> <= crash_end)) {
>> - pr_warn("Crash kernel can not overlap current kernel\n");
>> - return;
>> + kernel_start = __pa(_stext);
>> + kernel_size = _end - _stext;
>> +
>> + /* The crash region must not overlap the current kernel */
>> + if ((kernel_start + kernel_size > crash_base) &&
>> (kernel_start <= crash_end)) {
>> + pr_warn("Crash kernel can not overlap current kernel\n");
>> + return;
>> + }
>> }
>> - reserve_crashkernel_generic(crash_size, crash_base, 0, false);
>> + reserve_crashkernel_generic(crash_size, crash_base, low_size,
>> high);
>> }
>> void __init kdump_cma_reserve(void)
>
> - Hari
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-08-03 4:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-08 14:33 [PATCH v2 0/4] powerpc/kdump: Support high crashkernel reservation Sourabh Jain
2026-07-08 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] powerpc/mmu: do MMU type discovery before " Sourabh Jain
2026-07-10 2:44 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-07-13 13:12 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-26 10:54 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-03 3:45 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-08 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] powerpc: move to 64-bit RTAS Sourabh Jain
2026-07-26 10:55 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-03 3:56 ` Sourabh Jain
2026-07-08 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] powerpc/kdump: consider high crashkernel memory if enabled Sourabh Jain
2026-07-08 14:33 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] powerpc/kdump: add support for high crashkernel reservation Sourabh Jain
2026-07-26 10:56 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-03 4:09 ` Sourabh Jain [this message]
2026-07-26 11:23 ` Hari Bathini
2026-08-03 4:10 ` Sourabh Jain
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30ba5292-978d-4273-9862-61ee6e96cb11@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sourabhjain@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=adityag@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=hbathini@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mahesh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
--cc=shivangu@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox