From: Pratik Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
To: Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com,
ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling")
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2020 19:24:54 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <30ee9ce2-b27b-785d-21bf-890047b4b64d@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87v9n4o3fk.fsf@dja-thinkpad.axtens.net>
Hi Daniel,
Sure thing I'll re-send them. Rookie mistake, my bad.
Thanks for pointing it out!
Regards,
Pratik
On 16/03/20 6:35 pm, Daniel Axtens wrote:
> Hi Pratik,
>
> Please could you resend this with a more meaningful subject line and
> move the Fixes: line to immediately above your signed-off-by?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Regards,
> Daniel
>
>> The patch avoids allocating cpufreq_policy on stack hence fixing frame
>> size overflow in 'powernv_cpufreq_work_fn'
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Pratik Rajesh Sampat <psampat@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c | 13 ++++++++-----
>> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> index 56f4bc0d209e..20ee0661555a 100644
>> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/powernv-cpufreq.c
>> @@ -902,6 +902,7 @@ static struct notifier_block powernv_cpufreq_reboot_nb = {
>> void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>> {
>> struct chip *chip = container_of(work, struct chip, throttle);
>> + struct cpufreq_policy *policy;
>> unsigned int cpu;
>> cpumask_t mask;
>>
>> @@ -916,12 +917,14 @@ void powernv_cpufreq_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
>> chip->restore = false;
>> for_each_cpu(cpu, &mask) {
>> int index;
>> - struct cpufreq_policy policy;
>>
>> - cpufreq_get_policy(&policy, cpu);
>> - index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(&policy, policy.cur);
>> - powernv_cpufreq_target_index(&policy, index);
>> - cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy.cpus);
>> + policy = cpufreq_cpu_get(cpu);
>> + if (!policy)
>> + continue;
>> + index = cpufreq_table_find_index_c(policy, policy->cur);
>> + powernv_cpufreq_target_index(policy, index);
>> + cpumask_andnot(&mask, &mask, policy->cpus);
>> + cpufreq_cpu_put(policy);
>> }
>> out:
>> put_online_cpus();
>> --
>> 2.17.1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-03-16 15:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-03-06 11:05 [PATCH] Fixes: 227942809b52 ("cpufreq: powernv: Restore cpu frequency to policy->cur on unthrottling") Pratik Rajesh Sampat
2020-03-16 13:05 ` Daniel Axtens
2020-03-16 13:54 ` Pratik Sampat [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=30ee9ce2-b27b-785d-21bf-890047b4b64d@linux.ibm.com \
--to=psampat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=ego@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=pratik.r.sampat@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).