From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (mail-in-01.arcor-online.net [151.189.21.41]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.arcor.de", Issuer "Thawte Premium Server CA" (verified OK)) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC32DDF06 for ; Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:11:33 +1000 (EST) In-Reply-To: <20070424.212902.00454541.davem@davemloft.net> References: <20070424.110456.124867547.davem@davemloft.net> <1177459651.14873.164.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20070424.212902.00454541.davem@davemloft.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v623) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Message-Id: <3141ca4c9918b2da3184fb5de4a1674d@kernel.crashing.org> From: Segher Boessenkool Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] Start split out of common open firmware code Date: Wed, 25 Apr 2007 15:11:27 +0200 To: David Miller Cc: sfr@canb.auug.org.au, paulus@samba.org, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , >> end up with the OF analogue to an MSI layer that only >> ever can work on intel compatible platforms. > > Please don't use this straw-man. > > These days it works perfectly fine on sparc64. Yes, but how long did that take? And why? That's my point, not that "after this things cannot be solved anymore" -- sure they can, it gets a lot harder though. Segher