From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Date: Fri, 27 Aug 2004 19:16:42 +0400 From: Andrey Volkov Reply-To: Andrey Volkov Message-ID: <314790494.20040827191642@varma-el.com> To: Dan Malek Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re[2]: [RFC] Remove G2_LE core decl from CLASSIC_PPC part of arch/ppc/kernel/cputable.c In-Reply-To: References: <927068331.20040827153454@varma-el.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hello Dan, Friday, August 27, 2004, 7:00:59 PM, you wrote: >> Since G2_LE is NOT a "classic" core ( in particular - true >> little-endian), > How is it not a classic core? It certainly isn't bookE, and it isn't > 8xx. > No one should care about little-endian anyway. I'm voting for the > first candidate that makes that illegal. :-) Agree. >> With that move we'll conserve some memory of kernel, > How does this single change save anything but a few bytes of > cpu table? Maybe ~2K of rubbish for somebody "few" - for me not :) (don't forget its embedded platform). >> but need some explanations which PPCs based on >> it, for modify Kconfig ( I know MPC52xx and MPC82xx based on it). > What other kernel changes would you make based on > this configuration? Only Kconfig, nothing more. -- Best regards, Andrey Volkov ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/