Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: fsl, ls-extirq: convert to YAML

[Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>]

On 26/04/2022 09:28, Michael Walle wrote:
> Am 2022-04-26 08:53, schrieb Krzysztof Kozlowski:
>> On 25/04/2022 23:58, Michael Walle wrote:
>>>>> +  reg:
>>>>> +    maxItems: 1
>>>>> +    description:
>>>>> +      Specifies the Interrupt Polarity Control Register (INTPCR) in
>>>>> the
>>>>> +      SCFG or the External Interrupt Control Register (IRQCR) in 
>>>>> the
>>>>> ISC.
>>>>> +
>>>>> +  interrupt-map:
>>>
>>> btw.
>>>
>>> minItems: 12
>>> maxItems: 12
>>>
>>> Isn't working here, is that expected? The validator seem to get the
>>> count
>>> of the elements of one tuple wrong.
>>>
>>> I.e.
>>> arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls2080a-rdb.dtb:
>>> interrupt-controller@14: interrupt-map: [[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 4, 1, 0], [1,
>>> 0, 1, 4, 2, 0, 1, 0], [2, 4, 3, 0, 1, 0, 3, 4], [4, 0, 1, 0, 4, 4, 5,
>>> 0], [1, 0, 5, 4, 6, 0, 1, 0], [6, 4, 7, 0, 1, 0, 7, 4], [8, 0, 1, 0, 
>>> 8,
>>> 4, 9, 0], [1, 0, 9, 4, 10, 0, 1, 0], [10, 4, 11, 0, 1, 0, 11, 4]] is 
>>> too
>>> short
>>
>>
>> Works for me (in different schema)... maybe update your dtschema?
> 
> Just updated to the latest one. But I'm still getting the same errors.
> 
> $ dt-validate -V
> 2022.4
> 
> /home/mwalle/repos/b-linux-arm64/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/fsl-ls1088a-qds.dtb: 
> interrupt-controller@14: interrupt-map: [[0, 0, 1, 0, 0, 4, 1, 0], [1, 
> 0, 1, 4, 2, 0, 1, 0], [2, 4, 3, 0, 1, 0, 3, 4], [4, 0, 1, 0, 4, 4, 5, 
> 0], [1, 0, 5, 4, 6, 0, 1, 0], [6, 4, 7, 0, 1, 0, 7, 4], [8, 0, 1, 0, 8, 
> 4, 9, 0], [1, 0, 9, 4, 10, 0, 1, 0], [10, 4, 11, 0, 1, 0, 11, 4]] is too 
> short
> 	From schema: 
> /home/mwalle/repos/linux-mw/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/interrupt-controller/fsl,ls-extirq.yaml
> 
> How is the length of one entry calculated?

If you add maxItems to your original v2 binding example, it works. If
you replace your example with ls1088a and use maxItems:12, it works.

So maybe something is wrong in your modified patch (which we do not have
so we cannot test it)?

Best regards,
Krzysztof