From: Michael Habermann <MHabermann@gmx.de>
To: Matthew Locke <mlocke@mvista.com>
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Segmentation fault while dynamic linking
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2001 13:42:09 +0200 (MEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <32197.993642129@www29.gmx.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B39524B.5090108@mvista.com
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1539 bytes --]
> >>> My configuration: Kernel 2.4.4, glibc 2.2.2, bash 2.05, FADS, MPC855T
> >>
...
> > binutils 2.11.2
> > gcc 2.95.3
> > glibc 2.2.2
> >
> > Everything unpatched and downloaded from ftp.gnu.org.
>
>
> yeah, sounds like the cacheline problem. It is still in glibc 2.2.2 and
> 2.2.3.
>From what I read in the mailing list, I would also say it looks like this
problem.
I've recompiled my toolchain now with plain gnu software and the following
patches
from ftp.mvista.com and glibc-src package:
glibc22-27.patch glibc22-getaddrinfo.dpatch
glibc22-disable-static.dpatch glibc22-nss-upgrade.dpatch
glibc22-eo_EO.dpatch glibcbug.dpatch
But the problem is still there.
I couldn't find 'the cacheline patch'. Is it the one mentioned here:
http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-embedded/200003/msg00073.html
It contains for example this lines:
--- dl-machine.c.ORIG Fri Mar 5 00:26:43 1999
+++ dl-machine.c Sat Nov 6 14:33:47 1999
@@ -250,7 +250,11 @@
PowerPC processors have line sizes of exactly 32 bytes. */
size_modified = lazy ? rel_offset_words :
PLT_INITIAL_ENTRY_WORDS;
+#ifdef PPC_CACHELINESIZE_32
for (i = 0; i < size_modified; i+= 8)
+#else
+ for (i = 0; i < size_modified; i+= 4)
+#endif
But this increment is already at +4 in my nupatched glibc.
--
GMX - Die Kommunikationsplattform im Internet.
http://www.gmx.net
--
GMX Tipp:
Machen Sie Ihr Hobby zu Geld bei unserem Partner 1&1!
http://profiseller.de/info/index.php3?ac=OM.PS.PS003K00596T0409a
[-- Attachment #2: " --]
[-- Type: application/octet-stream, Size: 82 bytes --]
"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="
"
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-06-27 11:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-06-26 9:32 Segmentation fault while dynamic linking Michael Habermann
2001-06-26 17:12 ` Matthew Locke
2001-06-27 1:17 ` Michael Habermann
2001-06-27 3:26 ` Matthew Locke
2001-06-27 11:42 ` Michael Habermann [this message]
2001-06-27 17:08 ` Matthew Locke
2001-06-28 2:57 ` Michael Habermann
2001-06-28 6:46 ` Justin (Gus) Hurwitz
2001-06-28 16:20 ` Matthew Locke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=32197.993642129@www29.gmx.net \
--to=mhabermann@gmx.de \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=mlocke@mvista.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).