From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Subject: Re: [PATCH] powerpc: remove fpscr use from [kvm_]cvt_{fd,df} In-reply-to: <1282626718.22370.505.camel@pasglop> References: <27922.1282523025@neuling.org> <1282626718.22370.505.camel@pasglop> Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:15:25 +1000 Message-ID: <32250.1282626925@neuling.org> From: Michael Neuling Cc: linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, Andreas Schwab , kvm-ppc@vger.kernel.org, Paul Mackerras List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , > > Do some 32 bit processors need this? > > > > In 32 bit before the merge, we use to have code that did: > > > > #if defined(CONFIG_4xx) || defined(CONFIG_E500) > > #define cvt_fd without save/restore fpscr > > #else > > #define cvt_fd with save/restore fpscr > > #end if > > > > Kumar; does this ring any bells? > > I don't see anything in the various 440 docs I have at hand that would > hint at lfd/stfs adffecting FPSCR. The way the ifdefs are, it's the other way around. 4xx procs don't need to save/restore fpscr and others do. Mikey