From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Message-ID: <325-38173@sneakemail.com>
Date: Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:56:50 -0800
From: "Stephen Williams" <612dlag102@sneakemail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Which kernel tree
References: <10045-28297@sneakemail.com> <20040206031101.GB6578@gate.ebshome.net>
In-Reply-To: <20040206031101.GB6578@gate.ebshome.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
List-Id: <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>


Eugene Surovegin ebs-at-ebshome.net |PPC Linux Embedded| wrote:

> Try linuxppc-2.4 BK tree (ppc.bkbits.net) it should work just fine for
> 405GPr.
>
> If you have problems with 405 and this tree, please post them to this
> list :).
>
> Eugene.

OK, so that means I'm going to have to get accustomed to
bitkeeper. That'll be slightly interesting. (Grr..)


--
Steve Williams                "The woods are lovely, dark and deep.
steve at icarus.com           But I have promises to keep,
http://www.icarus.com         and lines to code before I sleep,
http://www.picturel.com       And lines to code before I sleep."


** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/