From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [112.213.38.117]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7912BC44529 for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from boromir.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4h4BZt3QfZz2xjd; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:16:22 +1000 (AEST) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=148.163.158.5 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1784625382; cv=none; b=GStO5Lflw+DgbUhVK07uG5EbfG+OOEjM29hsXJ6Yvyljvk8467k+Ycd+8WyrgU5eBuOPppMNWTK+IMel25og2sCnk0FcCye0yxoFBNyjVrD2i6QuYlU+rfr6Nesnia7jugreT7nvoSSmrk5vXFNshPJVkTVqfJRyB0MBXJaxA94cT+IbDluJh6wyORuLdZr/fJVdsSW6XZKpIehRdu8TeoZ4VckoOXewuecR5s0+43vACGi6Mk2czd6ujy6V7sNA6cEMJQVQpF2XW2jsf7mmzPYZ7Ro9m4Cyl0ote7LHUqcwjTfqYbI9nFJUJG5h4whgITV0dWBUjAEcRKIYZF+uWg== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=lists.ozlabs.org; s=201707; t=1784625382; c=relaxed/relaxed; bh=fHLWqUgFHQNKvwXtyU54BaREnD+CKEefOneTW1ZDfwQ=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=bEdN0nb/tXjauEoWJgRKXvwmC6nZ/Zob82fRwwk2p4/tNnSlVPPhkSBkixicNCYqBVDI26cpuZ8pom/X0PzI6oFR13l/Zd2ZHgVPKZ0OM8dXuzvgy6MzBXEomUToSls75NH/NSZHkUkrGbVw4aS5vTs6oTQ32JDSaTnoNMk0pHpPsGPV9Vppr2aL1yDaDCY37euGJ1u80DOvvHYoeaELf419bg64YeyGc15zOGogegrQoZElKIid2CrUW+0Q5PoUrGc0fkZXo5jYlpBtbD4FI4nn5Yir5HHIva/dOnrvGB244iyy1B3/9YizmMtaARkg8iBaP8gqoAkxV2FKbSHs4Q== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HuURaZfv; dkim-atps=neutral; spf=pass (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=maddy@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=HuURaZfv; dkim-atps=neutral Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.158.5; helo=mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=maddy@linux.ibm.com; receiver=lists.ozlabs.org) Received: from mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.158.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange x25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4h4BZs4NWGz2xLh for ; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 19:16:21 +1000 (AEST) Received: from pps.filterd (m0353725.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.18.1.11/8.18.1.11) with ESMTP id 66KNE9N33463514; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:06 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h= content-transfer-encoding:content-type:date:from:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:subject:to; s=pp1; bh=fHLWqU gFHQNKvwXtyU54BaREnD+CKEefOneTW1ZDfwQ=; b=HuURaZfv3xbO9U5xwlEZCZ RTMsT7AfK6aOB5U285EoQPi24W8zFDNOVQ8oOijoCm/dsTqaO6e4NrCV2GFjFlkE hi5ySI32cGiv498GJRp771Qg94mlht/U0kLVdiWUpk+Yg0YW+yDthAjoEaYDJnG+ z903+21WUOObICEOj8QfzuRCqc+9qBZ4V0wD1GfnybIuwVumdTUw9EhmNICyZGhJ AcziAIlZzz/hBNuHhPxYzLG/IqlqMC8z5UrJ+y/TZVGXr1h8psQOVI/gCLYLx/mL nefdeNDdkEafSD+rM9iM24dSVXBlwthCWRmxB7w743ummX/NDzU4FiScHApLx2Yw == Received: from ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (5d.69.3da9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.61.105.93]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4fg78g3dbt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from pps.filterd (ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.18.1.7/8.18.1.7) with ESMTP id 66L94Zbp009041; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:05 GMT Received: from smtprelay01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com ([172.16.1.68]) by ppma23.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (PPS) with ESMTPS id 4fgnah1j71-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:05 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com [10.241.53.101]) by smtprelay01.wdc07v.mail.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 66L9G47G52167030 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:04 GMT Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D03058062; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:04 +0000 (GMT) Received: from smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 406B85805A; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from [9.123.5.176] (unknown [9.123.5.176]) by smtpav02.dal12v.mail.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Tue, 21 Jul 2026 09:16:01 +0000 (GMT) Message-ID: <32f5998a-6ae7-4556-a78a-760e78d18e87@linux.ibm.com> Date: Tue, 21 Jul 2026 14:46:00 +0530 X-Mailing-List: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Owner: List-Post: List-Archive: , List-Subscribe: , , List-Unsubscribe: Precedence: list MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/5] powerpc/msi: Treat bitmap size as allocation failure To: Yury Norov , Michael Ellerman , Nicholas Piggin , "Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org References: <20260709020312.133977-1-ynorov@nvidia.com> <20260709020312.133977-3-ynorov@nvidia.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Madhavan Srinivasan In-Reply-To: <20260709020312.133977-3-ynorov@nvidia.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Reinject: loops=2 maxloops=12 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details-Enc: AW1haW4tMjYwNzIxMDA5NiBTYWx0ZWRfX3r4Vpo0ZDr2x BP/VVnVTXP+H9FDB4Ju+SNlDanO3YCE2GtBLgW+YK5eDnbL/6D25AMqYPNHMtCvFIiUKYUcWwbP XTT7+jdaKnMTRODV+ShvKMh4RFGvEhn4uz8/aV2+T9q6Cw4T9HPcnUkHd6znAC1nD4QiO/mgBnA l8VeS61sFpx6IzghCHkW3G+jDoP1xJbFDSbFf8yJQuoCtQiq+S/hDWTsqhaL944EV6+g9KM2k4g tuzd6kOWhjoSMRvY2bIcspcCesxFERvi20IwlnFltiDhXSHGAR0HtMCFEmzlEmzQ/hUpi004ruY keQ0A+uDY07b4Hb6SjWgkufpvEJaB6FJrlW5x1Aq89FfQhCXpCmP/W1QxDH3r49qSSs8RDCpx+h BoEArOsxAvj5Tw7Zvt5eT2eszsGmu0jj7EmLadTyhkCEEAmUsogjnQtitqNr/NHHaVl2OqZ2ANI sWM6GQewKA28dT8NMsw== X-Proofpoint-GUID: IHg63qAuoW_1YE4aMagp2Xrd5jCCD2Wc X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=MelcfZ/f c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=6a5f38d6 cx=c_pps a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:117 a=3Bg1Hr4SwmMryq2xdFQyZA==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=RAioF0-LDSMA:10 a=VkNPw1HP01LnGYTKEx00:22 a=RnoormkPH1_aCDwRdu11:22 a=V8glGbnc2Ofi9Qvn3v5h:22 a=VnNF1IyMAAAA:8 a=Ikd4Dj_1AAAA:8 a=phWOeXBnrK0COOzqZscA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Info: AW1haW4tMjYwNzIxMDA5NiBTYWx0ZWRfXyxH/b34QOE6N wsk1JCb6CudjsphRXGBeREiBCsMCYkb0RVdU/M8nQLZiBNcqvhb/LZYD8ab3U+8YtZPHNUFKvpY zkRirPTvOnCek30feKFgOtljjJSwwJg= X-Proofpoint-ORIG-GUID: bFLdXb6l0KnV9cugHfs5JQ10xHlbPWnk X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=baseguard engine=ICAP:2.0.293,Aquarius:18.0.1143,Hydra:6.1.134,FMLib:17.12.100.49 definitions=2026-07-20_06,2026-07-20_03,2025-10-01_01 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 impostorscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 priorityscore=1501 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 suspectscore=0 classifier=typeunknown authscore=0 authtc= authcc= route=outbound adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.22.0-2606150000 definitions=main-2607210096 On 7/9/26 7:33 AM, Yury Norov wrote: > bitmap_find_next_zero_area() uses an out-of-range return value to > indicate failure. Check for values greater than or equal to the bitmap > size so the caller does not depend on the exact failure sentinel. Changes seems to fine. Acked-by: Madhavan Srinivasan When reviewing this, I did find the return value of bitmap_find_next_zero_area to be unsigned long, but we are casting it to int. Not as concern at this point this will be an issue when irq_count exceeds. May be a follow patch is needed to fix this I guess. Maddy > Signed-off-by: Yury Norov > --- > arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c > index 456a4f64ae0a..2f38d4b41ad3 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/sysdev/msi_bitmap.c > @@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ int msi_bitmap_alloc_hwirqs(struct msi_bitmap *bmp, int num) > > offset = bitmap_find_next_zero_area(bmp->bitmap, bmp->irq_count, 0, > num, (1 << order) - 1); > - if (offset > bmp->irq_count) > + if (offset >= bmp->irq_count) > goto err; > > bitmap_set(bmp->bitmap, offset, num);