From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from ozlabs.org (ozlabs.org [203.10.76.45]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client CN "mx.ozlabs.org", Issuer "CA Cert Signing Authority" (verified OK)) by bilbo.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AB15AB7155 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:50:13 +1000 (EST) Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 04C1CDDD04 for ; Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:50:12 +1000 (EST) Message-Id: <344E0328-E45B-42B7-89D3-C5E1D83ADA29@kernel.crashing.org> From: Kumar Gala To: michael@ellerman.id.au In-Reply-To: <1244730787.4599.94.camel@concordia> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252; format=flowed; delsp=yes Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v935.3) Subject: Re: "test" branch updates Date: Thu, 11 Jun 2009 09:49:59 -0500 References: <1242631175.18075.54.camel@pasglop> <1244730787.4599.94.camel@concordia> Cc: linuxppc-dev list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On Jun 11, 2009, at 9:33 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote: > On Mon, 2009-05-18 at 17:19 +1000, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >> Just a quick note before I leave the office... >> >> I've just pushed out a bunch of stuff to my "test" branch. There's a >> couple of known breakage (iseries and 8xx) which will have to be =20 >> sorted >> out before that stuff goes into "next". hopefully in a couple of =20 >> days. >> >> Still... feel free to take a peek, test, etc... > > The swiotlb stuff doesn't build: > > arch/powerpc/kernel/dma-swiotlb.c > In function =91swiotlb_bus_to_virt=92: > 29: warning: passing argument 1 of =91swiotlb_bus_to_phys=92 makes =20= > integer from pointer without a cast > 29: error: too many arguments to function =91swiotlb_bus_to_phys=92 > At top level: > 42: error: conflicting types for =91swiotlb_bus_to_phys=92 > > > There's changes in linux-next that make it work, which look like =20 > they're > going via Ingo? I think those changes are now in Linus's tree. - k=