linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@huawei.com>
To: <akpm@linux-foundation.org>, <linux-mm@kvack.org>,
	<linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>, <x86@kernel.org>,
	<catalin.marinas@arm.com>, <will@kernel.org>,
	<linux-doc@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com,
	zhangshiming@oppo.com, lipeifeng@oppo.com,
	prime.zeng@hisilicon.com, arnd@arndb.de, corbet@lwn.net,
	peterz@infradead.org, realmz6@gmail.com,
	Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, yangyicong@hisilicon.com,
	openrisc@lists.librecores.org, xhao@linux.alibaba.com,
	darren@os.amperecomputing.com, huzhanyuan@oppo.com,
	guojian@oppo.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org,
	anshuman.khandual@arm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: arm64: bring up BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH
Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2022 16:53:20 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <34762b48-3da4-4f2e-64a7-68a44f21d4fd@huawei.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822082120.8347-1-yangyicong@huawei.com>

Hi mm and arm64 maintainers,

a gentle ping for this..

Thanks.

On 2022/8/22 16:21, Yicong Yang wrote:
> From: Yicong Yang <yangyicong@hisilicon.com>
> 
> Though ARM64 has the hardware to do tlb shootdown, the hardware
> broadcasting is not free.
> A simplest micro benchmark shows even on snapdragon 888 with only
> 8 cores, the overhead for ptep_clear_flush is huge even for paging
> out one page mapped by only one process:
> 5.36%  a.out    [kernel.kallsyms]  [k] ptep_clear_flush
> 
> While pages are mapped by multiple processes or HW has more CPUs,
> the cost should become even higher due to the bad scalability of
> tlb shootdown.
> 
> The same benchmark can result in 16.99% CPU consumption on ARM64
> server with around 100 cores according to Yicong's test on patch
> 4/4.
> 
> This patchset leverages the existing BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH by
> 1. only send tlbi instructions in the first stage -
> 	arch_tlbbatch_add_mm()
> 2. wait for the completion of tlbi by dsb while doing tlbbatch
> 	sync in arch_tlbbatch_flush()
> My testing on snapdragon shows the overhead of ptep_clear_flush
> is removed by the patchset. The micro benchmark becomes 5% faster
> even for one page mapped by single process on snapdragon 888.
> 
> -v3:
> 1. Declare arch's tlbbatch defer support by arch_tlbbatch_should_defer() instead
>    of ARCH_HAS_MM_CPUMASK, per Barry and Kefeng
> 2. Add Tested-by from Xin Hao
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-mm/20220711034615.482895-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/
> 
> -v2:
> 1. Collected Yicong's test result on kunpeng920 ARM64 server;
> 2. Removed the redundant vma parameter in arch_tlbbatch_add_mm()
>    according to the comments of Peter Zijlstra and Dave Hansen
> 3. Added ARCH_HAS_MM_CPUMASK rather than checking if mm_cpumask
>    is empty according to the comments of Nadav Amit
> 
> Thanks, Peter, Dave and Nadav for your testing or reviewing
> , and comments.
> 
> -v1:
> https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20220707125242.425242-1-21cnbao@gmail.com/
> 
> Anshuman Khandual (1):
>   mm/tlbbatch: Introduce arch_tlbbatch_should_defer()
> 
> Barry Song (3):
>   Revert "Documentation/features: mark BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH doesn't
>     apply to ARM64"
>   mm: rmap: Extend tlbbatch APIs to fit new platforms
>   arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation
> 
>  Documentation/features/arch-support.txt       |  1 -
>  .../features/vm/TLB/arch-support.txt          |  2 +-
>  arch/arm64/Kconfig                            |  1 +
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbbatch.h             | 12 ++++++++
>  arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbflush.h             | 28 +++++++++++++++++--
>  arch/x86/include/asm/tlbflush.h               | 15 +++++++++-
>  mm/rmap.c                                     | 19 +++++--------
>  7 files changed, 61 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/arm64/include/asm/tlbbatch.h
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2022-09-06  8:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-08-22  8:21 [PATCH v3 0/4] mm: arm64: bring up BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH Yicong Yang
2022-08-22  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] Revert "Documentation/features: mark BATCHED_UNMAP_TLB_FLUSH doesn't apply to ARM64" Yicong Yang
2022-09-09  4:26   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-09  4:40     ` Barry Song
2022-08-22  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] mm/tlbbatch: Introduce arch_tlbbatch_should_defer() Yicong Yang
2022-08-24  9:40   ` Kefeng Wang
2022-09-09  4:16   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-08-22  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] mm: rmap: Extend tlbbatch APIs to fit new platforms Yicong Yang
2022-08-24  9:43   ` Kefeng Wang
2022-09-09  4:51   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-09  5:25     ` Barry Song
2022-08-22  8:21 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: support batched/deferred tlb shootdown during page reclamation Yicong Yang
2022-08-24  9:46   ` Kefeng Wang
2022-09-09  5:24   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-09  5:35     ` Barry Song
2022-09-09  6:32       ` Yicong Yang
2022-09-15  6:07       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-15  6:42         ` Barry Song
2022-09-15 14:31           ` Nadav Amit
2022-09-19  2:46             ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-19  4:24           ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-19  4:53             ` Barry Song
2022-09-19  5:08               ` Barry Song
2022-09-20  3:00   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-20  3:39     ` Barry Song
2022-09-20  8:45       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-21  1:50         ` Barry Song
2022-09-21  1:51           ` Barry Song
2022-09-21  3:33             ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-21  6:53   ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-21  7:15     ` Barry Song
2022-09-21  7:17     ` Nadav Amit
2022-09-22  3:15       ` Anshuman Khandual
2022-09-06  8:53 ` Yicong Yang [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=34762b48-3da4-4f2e-64a7-68a44f21d4fd@huawei.com \
    --to=yangyicong@huawei.com \
    --cc=21cnbao@gmail.com \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=anshuman.khandual@arm.com \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=darren@os.amperecomputing.com \
    --cc=guojian@oppo.com \
    --cc=huzhanyuan@oppo.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mips@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
    --cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
    --cc=lipeifeng@oppo.com \
    --cc=openrisc@lists.librecores.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=prime.zeng@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=realmz6@gmail.com \
    --cc=wangkefeng.wang@huawei.com \
    --cc=will@kernel.org \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    --cc=xhao@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=yangyicong@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=zhangshiming@oppo.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).