From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
To: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
"Chen, Yu C" <yu.c.chen@intel.com>,
Ritesh Harjani <riteshh@linux.ibm.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 22:01:53 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3498bef8-8835-4971-a753-029d73acffc7@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ahhlrQ1XO47FusNi@linux.ibm.com>
On 5/28/26 9:26 PM, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
> * Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com> [2026-05-28 16:57:54]:
>
>>
>>
>> On 5/25/26 7:37 PM, Venkat Rao Bagalkote wrote:
>>> Greetings!!!
>>>
>>> I am seeing an early boot kernel panic due to NULL pointer dereference
>>> on a POWER9 (pSeries) system when testing linux-next (next-20260522).
>>>
>>
>> Hi Venkat, Ritesh,
>> Could you please try the below diff and see if it helps.
>> This helps to fix boot problem for SPLPAR for me.
>>
>> Hi Chenyu,
>> Let me know if I have to send the patch. Or
>> if you want to add more comments or change it feel free to pick it up and send it.
>> Either way is fine. Let me know.
>>
>> Hi Prateek, Srikar,
>> I hope the below diff makes sense. Please check.
>>
>> nit: llc_mask is still under CONFIG_SCHED_MC, for ppc it is set to true
>> always for SMP systems, and for others it is LLC domain. So not a concern i guess.
>> ---
>>
>> From 10e9413cef063446d67dc02c2b44e1ea582e5d53 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 06:16:44 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] topology: Provide arch_llc_mask for cache aware scheduling
>>
>> Venkat Reported a boot kernel panic next-20260522. Git bisect pointed to
>> b5ea300a17e3 ("sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous")
>>
>> Stacktrace points to llc_mask being null.
>>
>> NIP [c000000000e58504] _find_first_bit+0x44/0x130
>> LR [c000000000e58500] _find_first_bit+0x40/0x130
>> Call Trace:
>> build_sched_domains+0xad8/0xe50
>> sched_init_smp+0xa8/0x164
>> kernel_init_freeable+0x250/0x370
>> ret_from_kernel_user_thread+0x14/0x1c
>>
>> On powerpc, cpu_coregroup_mask is available only when the underlying
>> hardware support coregroup. In shared LPAR, QEMU guest or power9 etc
>> coregroup isn;t supported. In such cases llc_mask was being referrenced
>> when it was null leading to panic.
>>
>> on powerpc, LLC is at SMT core level. So assumption that coregroup(MC)
>> domain point to LLC is wrong. Provide a way for archs to say where its
>> LLC is if it not at MC domain.
>>
>> Fixes: b5ea300a17e3 ("sched/cache: Make LLC id continuous")
>> Reported-by: Venkat Rao Bagalkote <venkat88@linux.ibm.com>
>> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/all/51154de7-3700-4cb4-82f2-1b3a8fa427f7@linux.ibm.com/
>> Suggested-by: Chen, Yu C <yu.c.chen@intel.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Shrikanth Hegde <sshegde@linux.ibm.com>
>> ---
>> arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h | 3 +++
>> arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c | 10 ++++++++++
>> kernel/sched/topology.c | 9 +++++++++
>> 3 files changed, 22 insertions(+)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
>> index 66ed5fe1b718..bd1db3b1dbb0 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/topology.h
>> @@ -131,6 +131,9 @@ static inline int cpu_to_coregroup_id(int cpu)
>> #ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> #include <asm/cputable.h>
>> +const struct cpumask *arch_llc_mask(int cpu);
>> +#define arch_llc_mask arch_llc_mask
>> +
>> struct cpumask *cpu_coregroup_mask(int cpu);
>> const struct cpumask *cpu_die_mask(int cpu);
>> int cpu_die_id(int cpu);
>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> index 3467f86fd78f..cc8e87d6cae9 100644
>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/smp.c
>> @@ -1101,6 +1101,16 @@ const struct cpumask *cpu_die_mask(int cpu)
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpu_die_mask);
>> +const struct cpumask *arch_llc_mask(int cpu)
>> +{
>> + /* Power9, CACHE domain is the LLC*/
>> + if (shared_caches)
>> + return cpu_l2_cache_mask(cpu);
>> +
>> + /* For others, SMT domain is the LLC*/
>> + return cpu_smt_mask(cpu);
>> +}
>
> Why dont we do
> #define arch_llc_mask cpu_l2_cache_mask
>
I would prefer to keep the abstraction. This leaves
room for implementation details.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 16:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 14:07 [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-25 15:35 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-25 16:16 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 3:14 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26 3:14 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26 4:08 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-26 4:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-26 5:53 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 14:08 ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask Chen Yu
2026-05-27 7:01 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-27 16:05 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-27 18:07 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 4:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 9:12 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 10:26 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 15:54 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 15:58 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-27 16:30 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-26 5:24 ` [BUG] sched/cache: "Make LLC id continuous" causes NULL cpumask dereference in build_sched_domains on POWER9 Venkat Rao Bagalkote
2026-05-27 7:05 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 16:01 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 6:54 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 16:06 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 11:27 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-28 13:21 ` Chen, Yu C
2026-05-28 15:06 ` Ritesh Harjani
2026-05-28 15:56 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-28 16:31 ` Shrikanth Hegde [this message]
2026-05-28 16:44 ` Srikar Dronamraju
2026-05-29 3:58 ` Shrikanth Hegde
2026-05-29 6:59 ` Venkat Rao Bagalkote
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3498bef8-8835-4971-a753-029d73acffc7@linux.ibm.com \
--to=sshegde@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riteshh@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=srikar@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tim.c.chen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=venkat88@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox