From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
To: morten.banzon@axxessit.no
Cc: linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: MPC82xx -- DPRAM1
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 2004 18:11:43 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3639E976-39B7-11D9-8F98-003065F9B7DC@embeddededge.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <OF39E98ED9.64FBC87A-ONC1256F50.006BC66A-C1256F50.006EA31B@axxessit.no>
On Nov 18, 2004, at 3:08 PM, morten.banzon@axxessit.no wrote:
> If you know the reason to why it is "a very bad idea" to relocate these
> resources within dpram1 I am very curious to learn. On the other hand
> if
> you do not know, then please refrain from giving such a stupid answer.
As you have discovered, there are many dependencies on the
configuration of the cpm smc from the boot rom to bootloaders to
the Linux kernel itself. It's a bad idea to be changing one of these
without changing all of the others to match .... and then you end
up with a custom piece of software that you have to constantly
maintain. If you make it configurable, then you end up with even
more confusion when people mismatch the configurations on
a board.
There isn't any reason to change the current SMC buffering configuration
on the CPM2 (and future) devices. If you like change for the sake
of change, then go ahead and do it. We answered the questions
you asked and specifically said the changes you were making at
the time weren't a good idea. Just because you didn't agree
doesn't make it a stupid response, especially since it's pretty easy
to figure out on your own from looking at the code.
Thanks.
-- Dan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-11-18 23:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-11-18 20:08 MPC82xx -- DPRAM1 morten.banzon
2004-11-18 23:11 ` Dan Malek [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-11-19 14:25 Rune Torgersen
2004-11-22 19:54 ` Dan Malek
2004-11-19 2:24 morten.banzon
2004-11-18 10:49 morten.banzon
2004-11-18 17:38 ` Wolfgang Denk
2004-11-17 16:22 morten.banzon
2004-11-17 12:11 morten.banzon
2004-11-16 15:07 morten.banzon
2004-11-16 14:58 Rune Torgersen
2004-11-16 11:16 morten.banzon
2004-11-16 11:02 morten.banzon
2004-11-15 16:10 morten.banzon
2004-11-16 0:18 ` Dan Malek
2004-11-16 8:51 ` Conor McLoughlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3639E976-39B7-11D9-8F98-003065F9B7DC@embeddededge.com \
--to=dan@embeddededge.com \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org \
--cc=morten.banzon@axxessit.no \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox