From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gate.crashing.org (gate.crashing.org [63.228.1.57]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 422D3B6EDF for ; Thu, 19 May 2011 15:33:00 +1000 (EST) Subject: Re: powerpc: mpc85xx regression since 2.6.39-rc2, one cpu core lame Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Kumar Gala In-Reply-To: <1305755338.7481.8.camel@pasglop> Date: Thu, 19 May 2011 00:32:48 -0500 Message-Id: <369C774C-DF3B-4D8E-BABF-B1C9727AE96E@kernel.crashing.org> References: <20110517162827.GA16918@riccoc20.at.omicron.at> <1305668416.2781.23.camel@pasglop> <20110518120320.GA3025@riccoc20.at.omicron.at> <1305755338.7481.8.camel@pasglop> To: Benjamin Herrenschmidt Cc: Richard Cochran , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , On May 18, 2011, at 4:48 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt wrote: >=20 >> (I get the feeling that I am the only one testing recent kernels with >> the mpc85xx.) >>=20 >> Anyhow, I see that this commit was one of a series. For my own use, >> can I simply revert this one commit independently? >=20 > For your own use sure :-) But I'd still like to get to the bottom of > this ! >=20 > Cheers, > Ben. Tested the 'merge' branch and it appears to fix the issues with = secondary cores coming up. - k=