From: Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch>
To: Gary Thomas <gdt@linuxppc.org>
Cc: LinuxPPC-Dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: back to gcc under pre-R5
Date: Wed, 17 Feb 1999 15:10:53 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <36CACDEA.9F546221@pop.agri.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: XFMail.990217133431.gdt@linuxppc.org
Gary Thomas wrote:
>
> On 17-Feb-99 Andreas Tobler wrote:
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > is it possible to get back to gcc under pre-R5? If so. where can I get the (S)RPMS?
> >
> > And how much do it affect when I build the libstdc++ with fno-vtable-thunks?
> > Do I have to rebuild the whole system, since the new glibc needs vtables?
> > It's only because egcs has bug which is for my subject killing.
> >
>
> There are no current RPMs for GCC to my knowledge. The last ones I made nearly
> two years ago and gave up on shortly thereafter because EGCS was much superior.
>
I found a rpm with gcc-2.8.0-1.src.rpm, maybe??
I think it was on Linuxppc mirror in uk in the 'linuxppc-delete-me' folder.
> What bug in EGCS is so terrible that you are considering this move?
> Which version of EGCS have you tried?
It's not quite a bug, it's an optimization which is not implemented yet. The
vtable syndrom!
I tried egcs-1.0.3 under R4 there it works.
Also tried egcs-1.1.1.c on pre-R5 no success.
Built egcs -1.1.1ca by myself with vtable thunks off, doesn't work because
glibc needs vtable thunks. (Interpretation from my side when Franz Sirl
suggested to rebuild the glibc)
The whole story happens when I build JX (http://www.cco.caltech.edu/~jafl/jx/jx2.html)
CC get's a core dump in a few points.
I'd like to build this Code Crusader out of personal interest, maybe we can
share my experiences with others when they find to JX?
>
> There will be EGCS-1.1.2 in the very near future which has many PowerPC problems
> fixed, perhaps you can wait.
I could wait if this thing would be fixed, but as Mike Stump said, it wouldn't
be fixed in the near future.
Thanks
Andreas
--
------------------
| Andreas Tobler
| CH-8004 Zuerich
| E-mail: toa@pop.agri.ch
------------------------------------------
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. To unsubscribe from linuxppc-dev, send ]]
[[ the message 'unsubscribe' to linuxppc-dev-request@lists.linuxppc.org ]]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-02-17 14:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-02-17 8:16 back to gcc under pre-R5 Andreas Tobler
1999-02-17 13:34 ` Gary Thomas
1999-02-17 14:10 ` Andreas Tobler [this message]
1999-02-17 16:03 ` bugs building stuff.. somewhere.. (was: back to gcc under pre-R5) Brian Downing
1999-02-17 15:59 ` back to gcc under pre-R5 Tom Rini
1999-02-17 16:24 ` Andreas Tobler
1999-02-17 16:49 ` Tom Rini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=36CACDEA.9F546221@pop.agri.ch \
--to=toa@pop.agri.ch \
--cc=gdt@linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).