From: Martin Costabel <costabel@wanadoo.fr>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: OF booting news
Date: Thu, 20 May 1999 20:39:58 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <374456FE.F3AD5501@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 374440FF.D74A6407@americasm01.nt.com
Jerry Quinn wrote:
>
> Remco Post wrote:
> > BootX is a huge improvement if you like waiting for a machine to boot and have
> > an option. Quik is still my favourite since I never boot MacOS on my 7200.
> BootX is a huge improvement because it allows OS choice in a clean
> manner. I don't like waiting for my system to boot any more than the
> next person, although timeout on an OS chooser doesn't bother me.
I am curious: Has anyone ever compared the actual booting times for OF
booting and BootX booting (I can't, because my 6400 doesn't OF boot
anymore). I suspect the difference is less than 10 seconds. On a total
booting time of more than 60 seconds, this is really minimal.
I just rebooted, and the total time of 110 seconds (from typing "reboot"
until the login prompt) was spent as follows:
35 sec: shutdown
23 sec: starting MacOS and BootX extension, hitting the button, waiting
for the
penguin to show up and the kernel messages to start scrolling by
52 sec: rest of linux boot procedure.
--
Martin
[[ This message was sent via the linuxppc-dev mailing list. Replies are ]]
[[ not forced back to the list, so be sure to Cc linuxppc-dev if your ]]
[[ reply is of general interest. Please check http://lists.linuxppc.org/ ]]
[[ and http://www.linuxppc.org/ for useful information before posting. ]]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-05-20 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-15 8:09 OF booting news Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-05-18 13:17 ` Tom Rini
1999-05-19 13:09 ` Jerry Quinn
1999-05-19 13:27 ` Tom Rini
1999-05-19 14:49 ` Jerry Quinn
1999-05-20 8:42 ` Remco Post
1999-05-20 17:06 ` Jerry Quinn
1999-05-20 18:39 ` Martin Costabel [this message]
1999-05-31 11:43 ` Philipp Tomsich
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=374456FE.F3AD5501@wanadoo.fr \
--to=costabel@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).