From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <dan@embeddededge.com>
Received: from penguin.netx4.com (embeddededge.com [209.113.146.155])
	(using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
	(Client did not present a certificate)
	by ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 053FE67A70
	for <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>;
	Sat, 26 Mar 2005 08:52:13 +1100 (EST)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503251617100.15647@localhost.localdomain>
References: <Pine.LNX.4.61.0503251617100.15647@localhost.localdomain>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v619.2)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed
Message-Id: <3787fed579cbb8849677a0baa10e0ee4@embeddededge.com>
From: Dan Malek <dan@embeddededge.com>
Date: Fri, 25 Mar 2005 16:52:05 -0500
To: "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday@mindspring.com>
Cc: Embedded PPC Linux list <linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
Subject: Re: still not clear on which tree to be using these days
List-Id: Linux on Embedded PowerPC Developers Mail List
	<linuxppc-embedded.ozlabs.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-embedded>
List-Post: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded@ozlabs.org>
List-Help: <mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-embedded>,
	<mailto:linuxppc-embedded-request@ozlabs.org?subject=subscribe>


On Mar 25, 2005, at 4:19 PM, Robert P. J. Day wrote:

>   what is the proper tree to be using these days for a 2.6 kernel on
> 8xx?  for the longest time, i've used the "bk" checkout from
> bkbits.net, but i see others now working with what looks like the
> latest stock 2.6.x release.

I just use the latest kernel.org tree for everything.  If I'm submitting
a patch, or working with someone else, I use the bk tree just to
be that little more up to date.


	-- Dan