From: Brendan Simon <bsimon@ctam.com.au>
To: sébastien tadéoni <sebastien_tadeoni@yahoo.fr>
Cc: linux ppc embedded <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Questions on the MPC8xx-2.3.10 realease.
Date: Fri, 24 Sep 1999 10:37:53 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37EAC7E0.3AE82656@ctam.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 19990923150552.23602.rocketmail@web601.yahoomail.com
sébastien tadéoni wrote:
> Hi PPCpeople;
>
> I worked recently on the mpc8xx-2.3.10 sources, and I
> had less problem for compilation than with the 2.2.5
> release, but it stays some 'undefined reference to
> :kbd_pt_regs, fg_console, no_scroll.....'.
>
> I think it is a configuration problem, but I don't
> find any solution (and I wonder if I will find the
> good configuration one day). I noticed like Brendan
> that some parameter are configured even if you didn't
> want.
> I edited the autoconf.h but no really changes.
Dan suggests (look at the mailing list archives) that linux-2.3.18.tgz
is what you should use instead of mpc8xx-2.3.10.tgz. He also suggested
that he might remove the mpc8xx-2.3.10.tgz archive and I think that
would be a good idea if it has problems compiling or has some confusing
elements. Since it is a bleeding edge release you must expect
problems. I have reverted back to the embedded-2.2.5.tgz archive for my
port. It compiles fine with the right options. I would probably
recommend the 2.2.5 stuff for first timers (like me) as this is the most
stable version and there are apparently lots of MPC8xx boards using this
kernel.
> According to Dan, it seems to be tooo difficult to
> cross compile on a host pentium machine (I begin to be
> mainly agree with him),so I'm going to obtain a
> powermac station.
>
> However I would like to know before if someone has
> already succeeded to build a zImage or zImage.initrd
> configured for a MPC860 MBX board on a host pentium
> (II 400) station?
I have had no problems compiling the kernel with the x86->ppc
cross-compiler, though I would still love to have a PowerPC machine
instead of an x86. The only problems I had have been choosing the right
configuration options. Once you have sorted this out you should be
fine. Have you installed a x86-ppc cross-compiler ? I can help you if
you are having problems with it (building the compiler or using it to
compile the kernel). Note that any questions on building an i86->ppc
cross-compiler should be sent to the crossgcc mailing list. See
http://www.objsw.com for FAQ and subscription details. I am using
egcs-1.1.2 and there is a prebuilt egcs-1.1.1 cross-compiler available
from the LinuxPPC web pages.
Brendan Simon.
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-24 0:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-23 15:05 Questions on the MPC8xx-2.3.10 realease sébastien tadéoni
1999-09-23 17:31 ` Scott Wood
1999-09-24 0:37 ` Brendan Simon [this message]
1999-09-27 10:17 ` Marcus Sundberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37EAC7E0.3AE82656@ctam.com.au \
--to=bsimon@ctam.com.au \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=sebastien_tadeoni@yahoo.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).