From: Frederic Barrat <fbarrat@linux.ibm.com>
To: Christophe Lombard <clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com,
ajd@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 1/5] ocxl: Assign a register set to a Logical Partition
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 11:35:05 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37ae4bba-c260-c3c5-dd9f-c4e91e86a023@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201120173241.59229-2-clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
On 20/11/2020 18:32, Christophe Lombard wrote:
> Platform specific function to assign a register set to a Logical Partition.
> The "ibm,mmio-atsd" property, provided by the firmware, contains the 16
> base ATSD physical addresses (ATSD0 through ATSD15) of the set of MMIO
> registers (XTS MMIO ATSDx LPARID/AVA/launch/status register).
>
> For the time being, the ATSD0 set of registers is used by default.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe Lombard <clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h | 3 ++
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c | 48 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 2 files changed, 51 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> index d37ededca3ee..3f38aed7100c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pnv-ocxl.h
> @@ -28,4 +28,7 @@ int pnv_ocxl_spa_setup(struct pci_dev *dev, void *spa_mem, int PE_mask, void **p
> void pnv_ocxl_spa_release(void *platform_data);
> int pnv_ocxl_spa_remove_pe_from_cache(void *platform_data, int pe_handle);
>
> +int pnv_ocxl_map_lpar(struct pci_dev *dev, uint64_t lparid,
> + uint64_t lpcr, void __iomem **arva);
> +void pnv_ocxl_unmap_lpar(void __iomem **arva);
> #endif /* _ASM_PNV_OCXL_H */
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
> index ecdad219d704..bc20cf867900 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/ocxl.c
> @@ -483,3 +483,51 @@ int pnv_ocxl_spa_remove_pe_from_cache(void *platform_data, int pe_handle)
> return rc;
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnv_ocxl_spa_remove_pe_from_cache);
> +
> +int pnv_ocxl_map_lpar(struct pci_dev *dev, uint64_t lparid,
> + uint64_t lpcr, void __iomem **arva)
> +{
> + struct pci_controller *hose = pci_bus_to_host(dev->bus);
> + struct pnv_phb *phb = hose->private_data;
> + u64 mmio_atsd;
> + int rc;
> +
> + /* ATSD physical address.
> + * ATSD LAUNCH register: write access initiates a shoot down to
> + * initiate the TLB Invalidate command.
> + */
> + rc = of_property_read_u64_index(hose->dn, "ibm,mmio-atsd",
> + 0, &mmio_atsd);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_info(&dev->dev, "No available ATSD found\n");
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + /* Assign a register set to a Logical Partition and MMIO ATSD
> + * LPARID register to the required value.
> + */
> + if (mmio_atsd)
If we don't have the "ibm,mmio-atsd", i.e on P9, then we've already
exited above. So why not consider mmio_atsd as an error?
> + rc = opal_npu_map_lpar(phb->opal_id, pci_dev_id(dev),
> + lparid, lpcr);
> + if (rc) {
> + dev_err(&dev->dev, "Error mapping device to LPAR: %d\n", rc);
> + return rc;
> + }
> +
> + if (mmio_atsd) {
Same here
> + *arva = ioremap(mmio_atsd, 24);
> + if (!(*arva)) {
> + dev_warn(&dev->dev, "ioremap failed - mmio_atsd: %#llx\n", mmio_atsd);
> + rc = -ENOMEM;
> + }
> + }
> +
> + return rc;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnv_ocxl_map_lpar);
> +
> +void pnv_ocxl_unmap_lpar(void __iomem **arva)
The arva argument doesn't need to be a double pointer. Void * is enough.
Fred
> +{
> + iounmap(*arva);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(pnv_ocxl_unmap_lpar);
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-11-23 10:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-11-20 17:32 [PATCH V2 0/5] ocxl: Mmio invalidation support Christophe Lombard
2020-11-20 17:32 ` [PATCH V2 1/5] ocxl: Assign a register set to a Logical Partition Christophe Lombard
2020-11-23 10:35 ` Frederic Barrat [this message]
2020-11-20 17:32 ` [PATCH V2 2/5] ocxl: Initiate a TLB invalidate command Christophe Lombard
2020-11-23 10:37 ` Frederic Barrat
2020-11-20 17:32 ` [PATCH V2 3/5] ocxl: Update the Process Element Entry Christophe Lombard
2020-11-23 10:38 ` Frederic Barrat
2020-11-20 17:32 ` [PATCH V2 4/5] ocxl: Add mmu notifier Christophe Lombard
2020-11-23 10:40 ` Frederic Barrat
2020-11-24 9:17 ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-24 13:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2020-11-24 16:48 ` Christophe Lombard
2020-11-20 17:32 ` [PATCH V2 5/5] ocxl: Add new kernel traces Christophe Lombard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=37ae4bba-c260-c3c5-dd9f-c4e91e86a023@linux.ibm.com \
--to=fbarrat@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=ajd@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=clombard@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=fbarrat@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).