From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <382B46D4.E10355E1@netx4.com> Date: Thu, 11 Nov 1999 17:44:36 -0500 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: reekes@kerbango.com CC: linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org, nick@kerbango.com Subject: Re: does soft-float work? References: <382B39C8.EF61D039@kerbango.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Jim Reekes wrote: > I add the -soft-float option or -mcpu=823. I didn't know 823 was an option. I thought all that was supported was 821 and 860....Doesn't matter, it should simply be 8xx anyway. > gcc -g -lm -msoft-float mathtest.c Well, now...that -lm looks a little suspicious. The libary was probably compiled with hardware floating point assumed (unless you built your own). I also remember speaking to someone that found a varargs and software floating point combination bug.....let me try and track that down. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/