linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Erik Winkler <ewinkler@erols.com>
To: happyoscar42@usa.net
Cc: "Momchil 'Velco' Velikov" <velco@fadata.bg>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: [OT] dual 8500
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 1999 09:00:05 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <382C1D65.205953EE@erols.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 382B2359.51B1F11A@usa.net


I used a dual-180 Daystar card in my 8500 and it worked great.  Yes, the
memory interleaving did help a lot under Linux as David notes below.
You'll want to get an SMP kernel from
ftp://borg.mit.edu/pub/linux/ppc/kernels/multiprocessor/ and then compile
your own at some point.  These kernels worked for me.

Erik

David Riley wrote:

> Brad Boyer wrote:
> >
> > Momchil 'Velco' Velikov wrote:
> > > Does anyone of you have any experience (either good or bad)
> > > with PowerMac 8500 with dual-processor card and Linux ?
> >
> > I have both good and bad experiences with dual processor cards,
> > although I was using a 7600.  When it works, it is wonderful, but
> > it occasionally gets confused in interesting ways.  It seems to be
> > very sensitive to everything, and I had to rearrange the RAM in
> > the slots to get Linux to work.  It somtimes requires the MacOS
> > extensions to load to reinitialize stuff if it crashes in a bad
> > state.  It will make Linux much faster, tho.  I replaced a 132MHz
> > 604 board with a dual 200MHz 604e one and it was a very nice change.
>
> Oh yes, there is something you should know.  When you install the MP
> card, you WILL want to interleave your RAM.  You'll want to do it
> anyways, because the PowerPC is able to do double-bandwidth bursts if
> you interleave identically sized dimms.  On linux, since the OS runs
> both the processors in an efficient manner (unlike the MacOS) this is
> more or less required for an MP card.  On the MacOS, it will result
> mostly in a speed boost (this includes single processors, too).
>
> > > I intend to obtain one, but I definitely want to run
> > > Linux on it. I don't care much if MacOS doesn't work
> > > on such a machine.
> >
> > They work fine in the MacOS, but you won't see much improvement
> > on most things.
>
> In general, the MP cards work better on the MacOS than in linux (most
> things do, because almost everything in linux is still more or less
> under development).  However, only recent versions of the OS even take
> advantage of MP cards, and the only MP-enhanced program that I know of
> is Photoshop.
>
> --
> --"Your mouse has been moved.  Windows 95 must be restarted for change
> to take effect."


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

      reply	other threads:[~1999-11-12 14:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-11-11 20:36 [OT] dual 8500 Momchil 'Velco' Velikov
1999-11-12 10:56 ` Brad Boyer
1999-11-11 20:13   ` David Riley
1999-11-12 14:00     ` Erik Winkler [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=382C1D65.205953EE@erols.com \
    --to=ewinkler@erols.com \
    --cc=happyoscar42@usa.net \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=velco@fadata.bg \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).