linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Martin Costabel <costabel@wanadoo.fr>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@linux-m68k.org>,
	Dev-Linux <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: Kernel debugging??
Date: Thu, 18 Nov 1999 10:13:12 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3833C328.CD5AA36D@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38333EDA.D5DA1F47@wanadoo.fr


Martin Costabel wrote:
> 

> (*) Correction. I ran rsync while typing this letter. It's 2.3.28 now. I
> am curious to see how this will run.

Followup: Paul's 2.3.28 runs very well on my 6400.

One curious thing, though: I played with hdparm for the internal IDE
disk. Turns out that it is faster with DMA turned OFF (I did a PIO
autotune hdparm -p  before):

root[90]#hdparm -d0 /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
 setting using_dma to 0 (off)
 using_dma    =  0 (off)
root[91]#hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   64 MB in  2.91 seconds =21.99 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  32 MB in  5.62 seconds = 5.69 MB/sec
root[92]#hdparm -d1 /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
 setting using_dma to 1 (on)
 using_dma    =  1 (on)
root[93]#hdparm -tT /dev/hda
/dev/hda:
 Timing buffer-cache reads:   64 MB in  2.91 seconds =21.99 MB/sec
 Timing buffered disk reads:  32 MB in 10.21 seconds = 3.13 MB/sec

This is repeatable. And there is still some strange swapping going on
that shouldn't be necessary (no high charge, just some window switching
in X). But now that I went back to BootX-1.1.3, the overall speed is OK.

--
Martin

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~1999-11-18  9:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-11-16 12:25 Kernel debugging?? Andreas Tobler
1999-11-16 15:52 ` Ani Joshi
1999-11-16 16:03   ` Andreas Tobler
1999-11-16 17:45     ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-11-16 22:44       ` Martin Costabel
1999-11-17 21:08         ` Geert Uytterhoeven
1999-11-17 23:48           ` Martin Costabel
1999-11-18  9:13             ` Martin Costabel [this message]
1999-11-18  0:35           ` Extreme swapping / new location of Paul's kernels [was Re: Kernel debugging??] phandel
1999-11-18 10:04             ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-11-18 10:22               ` phandel
1999-11-18 10:40                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-11-19  0:51               ` Martin Costabel
1999-11-19 10:25                 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-11-18  2:37           ` Kernel debugging?? Paul Mackerras
1999-11-18 17:32             ` Michael Fenske
1999-11-18 18:30               ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-11-19  9:10                 ` Michael Fenske
1999-11-20 19:36                   ` Joel Klecker
1999-11-18 18:34               ` Kevin Hendricks
1999-11-18 23:29                 ` Paul Mackerras
1999-11-18 10:02           ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
1999-11-22 20:00             ` Geert Uytterhoeven

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3833C328.CD5AA36D@wanadoo.fr \
    --to=costabel@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=geert@linux-m68k.org \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).