From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <383A3610.BF976EDF@netx4.com> Date: Tue, 23 Nov 1999 01:37:04 -0500 From: Dan Malek MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Cort Dougan CC: Christian Zankel , linuxppc-devel@lists.linuxppc.org, linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: bootloader & head.S weirdness & restructuring References: <19991122120429.031138@mailhost.mipsys.com> <19991122143732.B12973@hq.fsmlabs.com> <3839CF18.5D600DE@mvista.com> <19991122165535.A13360@hq.fsmlabs.com> <383A0AA4.1E4227DC@mvista.com> <19991122204001.A14117@hq.fsmlabs.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Cort Dougan wrote: > Yes, I do walk along that path quite often :) > } head.S. (Try to walk along the 'path' of the 8xx implementation). OK, I am a little clueless at this hour. As it appears you are making fun of the way I wrote that code, perhaps you should provide a suggestion. I have more, the 82xx looks just like that :-)......I am off to look at the m68k tree...... > } I thought that Dan Mallek is working on the 82xx port. Yes, I am. Although it is not really 82xx. The 8240 is a 603 with a diluted MPC106 without OF. When attached to the Sandpoint, it looks somewhat like the Gemini port. The 8260 is a 603 with a hot rod CPM, so it looks more like the current 8xx port. Both of these use the "board information" structure in place of the OF residual like I did on the 8xx. -- Dan ** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/