linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Matthew Locke <mlocke@onemain.com>
To: <govindan@tejasnetworks.com>,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org,
	damm@kierayapc01.p.y.ki.era.ericsson.se,
	dhinds@pcmcia.sourceforge.org
Cc: gopi@tejasnetworks.com
Subject: RE: Problem with PCMCIA and RPXCLASSIC
Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 13:38:42 -0500 (EST)	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <384433732.977423922543.JavaMail.root@web625-wrb.mail.com> (raw)


Hi Mathew Locke,

>The pcmcia-3.1.22 has compilation problems as the mpc8xx_bdinfo >is not
>defined.  It is used only for the frequency, hence we hard >coded it to
>40MHz(which is our boards operating freq).

yeah, i forgot to export that in my patch.

>Then we gave _IO_BASE = 0x80000000
>This still did not work and the kernel panics.  We had to >comment out
>a line in ll_rw_blk.c( where and outb_p is called)..
>After this the kernel comes up.

So, IO_BASE = 0x80000000 does work, ll_rw_blk.c is an unrelated bug.

>Wpe suspect some goof up in the file: >arch/ppc/kernel/m8xx_setup.c
>Here ATA_FLASH is defined to 1.(and the comment is:
>  /* Define this to make a PCMCIA ATA Flash card work.
>  */
>)
>But with this define, the function rpx_pcmcia_config() doesnt >get
>called at all.

It may be a little confusing, but since it works for me I doubt there is a
goof up. The confusing part is that there is code in there to bypass card
services for ATA cards.  Instead of deleting it, I left it so that people
who don't want the overhead of card services (my guess is that it doesn't
really affect perfomance that much) don't have to use it.

>Does anyone have a patch for this file?

you have the patch that works.

>Also, what should be the values in the config.opts for this?

config.opts is not used for the 8xx.

you can send me a microdrive and I will figure out what the problem is.

>I HAVE READ IN THE MAILING LIST from Dan dated TUE 02, may 2000
>that he has successfully used IBM Micro drive with MPC860 PCMCIA.
>has anybody got the detail information ?

I don't think Dan uses card services.  He has code in the kernel that
connects the ide driver directly to the 8xx pcmcia controller.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-12-21 18:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-21 18:38 Matthew Locke [this message]
2000-12-21 19:15 ` Problem with PCMCIA and RPXCLASSIC Dan Malek
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-28  6:15 gopi krishna
2000-12-19 19:06 Matthew Locke
2000-12-20 17:38 ` Govindan
2000-12-19 13:22 Govindan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=384433732.977423922543.JavaMail.root@web625-wrb.mail.com \
    --to=mlocke@onemain.com \
    --cc=damm@kierayapc01.p.y.ki.era.ericsson.se \
    --cc=dhinds@pcmcia.sourceforge.org \
    --cc=gopi@tejasnetworks.com \
    --cc=govindan@tejasnetworks.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).