linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dan Malek <dan@netx4.com>
To: Marcus Sundberg <erammsu@kieraypc01.p.y.ki.era.ericsson.se>
Cc: Graham Stoney <greyham@research.canon.com.au>,
	linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T
Date: Thu, 09 Dec 1999 13:11:00 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <384FF0B4.E59398ED@netx4.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: kfyr9gwz7j7.fsf@kieraypc07.p.y.ki.era.ericsson.se


Marcus Sundberg wrote:


> On vxworks the same program gives about 27 Mbit throughput, and
> Windriver claims this is a limitation in the hardware...

Of course they would.  There are lots of stories floating
around about the 8xx hardware limitations.  There are manual
pages and application notes that describe how the 8xx hardware
works (in particular the CPM), and how you compute the capabilities.
In my experience, it has lived up to the publications.  You can
do things that are simply inefficient, or think about the
system architecture or application and program it to do the
things it can perform.

Even if it is "only" 20 something Mbits, how does that affect
your application?  That is more than double what Graham was
expecting for his.

Remember Ethernet is a shared resource without any
deterministic or bandwidth guarantees.  If it doesn't meet
your requirements, perhaps you should choose from the
variety of other interfaces the 8xx provides.

It can run an infinite loop as fast as anything else........



	-- Dan

** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~1999-12-09 18:11 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-12-07  6:41 FEC ERROR 41200000 on CLLF-860T Graham Stoney
1999-12-07  6:54 ` Dan Malek
1999-12-07  7:05   ` Graham Stoney
1999-12-07 17:23     ` Dan Malek
1999-12-09  0:24       ` Graham Stoney
1999-12-09 11:18         ` Marcus Sundberg
1999-12-09 18:11           ` Dan Malek [this message]
1999-12-10 12:39             ` Marcus Sundberg
1999-12-12 23:56               ` Graham Stoney
1999-12-13  1:25                 ` Dan Malek
1999-12-15 16:20                 ` Marcus Sundberg

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=384FF0B4.E59398ED@netx4.com \
    --to=dan@netx4.com \
    --cc=erammsu@kieraypc01.p.y.ki.era.ericsson.se \
    --cc=greyham@research.canon.com.au \
    --cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).