From: Dan Dickey <ddickey@charter.net>
To: Dan Malek <dan@netx4.com>
Cc: "linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org"
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>,
Linux PPC Dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: MPC850 Development Board - with SDRAM
Date: Sun, 09 Jan 2000 20:14:40 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38794090.8D116362@charter.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38791AAD.F3EBA3A2@netx4.com
Dan Malek wrote:
>
> Dan Dickey wrote:
>
> > yes - I have an RPX Lite sitting right next to me.
> > But, apparently Embedded Planet doesn't have any
> > development boards with SDRAM on them.
>
> Embedded Planet does not build development boards, they
> build production boards for OEMs to integrate into products
> to reduce development cost and risk.
Sorry - didn't mean to imply that. I'm aware of what they
advertise on their web page (http://www.embeddedplanet.com/)
and how some of it is used. I'm not sure that any "smaller"
companies actually make powerpc development systems - instead,
I can only find them at Motorola and IBM, and ???.
> There is always
> a debate about EDO versus SDRAM. Their design started wtih
> EDO, and since it continues to be available with both
> competitive cost and performance there isn't a reason to
> change the design.
>
> Products that wish to use SDRAM do so by placing it on their
> boards that connect to the Embedded Planet board. This allows
> the flexibility to add the necessary amount of memory for
> the product requirements. You can use the UPMB signals from
> the RPX-Lite processor bus connector in your design if you
> require SDRAM.
>
> -- Dan
Yes, I've become a little more aware of this situation since
claiming the above. Here's a message I received from
Robert Applebaum (who works for Embedded Planet I believe).
He gave permission to repost this to the list.
Robert Applebaum wrote:
>
> Dan, we use EDO on CPU boards, but have PC100 SDRAM on new IO cards such as
> the VEXC which use the UPM B (the EDO on UPM A are used as a single Heap)
>
> all our new products have SDRAM
I haven't responded back to Robert yet; but I'm intrigued by the
last line - is there a system in the works that has SDRAM on it?
(And no EDO). Time will tell.
And yes - I'm aware that Embedded Planet isn't in the
development system market - but you do have to admit, their
boards also fulfill that requirement pretty well. :)
-Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-10 2:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-08 18:14 MPC850 Development Board - with SDRAM Dan Dickey
2000-01-09 23:33 ` Dan Malek
2000-01-10 2:14 ` Dan Dickey [this message]
2000-01-10 3:01 ` Dan Malek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38794090.8D116362@charter.net \
--to=ddickey@charter.net \
--cc=dan@netx4.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).