* ~{;X84~}: problem with gunzip()
@ 2000-01-10 8:48 Shuangjun Zhu
2000-01-10 10:14 ` ;X84: " LiuTao
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Shuangjun Zhu @ 2000-01-10 8:48 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: LiuTao, LinuxPPC Developers List, linuxppc-embedded
Before you gunzip the kernel, clear the interrupt bit in the
machine status register.
-----Original Message-----
From: LiuTao <tliu@ict.ac.cn>
To: LinuxPPC Developers List <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>; linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
<linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
Date: Monday, January 10, 2000 4:43 PM
Subject: problem with gunzip()
>
>Hi
>
>When I ported linux to a board with MPC860, 16M RAM and 2M Flash,
>I met a problem.
>After the program gunzip()(misc.c) the vmlinux image to address 0x0,
>the contents from 0x0 to IMAGE_SIZE should be as same as that in
>linux/vmlinux, right? I found that they are not same. Only from 0x0
>to about 0xb500, they are same.
>I don't think gunzip() has any problem.
>Do you have any suggestions?
>Thanks!
>
>LiuTao
>
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: ;X84: problem with gunzip()
2000-01-10 8:48 ~{;X84~}: problem with gunzip() Shuangjun Zhu
@ 2000-01-10 10:14 ` LiuTao
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: LiuTao @ 2000-01-10 10:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Shuangjun Zhu (r44089), LinuxPPC Developers List,
linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
You mean the extenal interrupt enable bit?
It's really disabled before gunzip.
LiuTao
Shuangjun Zhu wrote:
>
> Before you gunzip the kernel, clear the interrupt bit in the
> machine status register.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: LiuTao <tliu@ict.ac.cn>
> To: LinuxPPC Developers List <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>; linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org
> <linuxppc-embedded@lists.linuxppc.org>
> Date: Monday, January 10, 2000 4:43 PM
> Subject: problem with gunzip()
>
> >
> >Hi
> >
> >When I ported linux to a board with MPC860, 16M RAM and 2M Flash,
> >I met a problem.
> >After the program gunzip()(misc.c) the vmlinux image to address 0x0,
> >the contents from 0x0 to IMAGE_SIZE should be as same as that in
> >linux/vmlinux, right? I found that they are not same. Only from 0x0
> >to about 0xb500, they are same.
> >I don't think gunzip() has any problem.
> >Do you have any suggestions?
> >Thanks!
> >
> >LiuTao
> >
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-01-10 10:14 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-01-10 8:48 ~{;X84~}: problem with gunzip() Shuangjun Zhu
2000-01-10 10:14 ` ;X84: " LiuTao
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).