From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-15.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_CR_TRAILER,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A800C64E7B for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:29:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [203.11.71.2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3C4CE221FA for ; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:29:41 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3C4CE221FA Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Received: from bilbo.ozlabs.org (lists.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2401:3900:2:1::3]) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4CmQvR3nHVzDrB0 for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:29:39 +1100 (AEDT) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; spf=pass (sender SPF authorized) smtp.mailfrom=linux.ibm.com (client-ip=148.163.156.1; helo=mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com; envelope-from=tyreld@linux.ibm.com; receiver=) Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linux.ibm.com Authentication-Results: lists.ozlabs.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key; unprotected) header.d=ibm.com header.i=@ibm.com header.a=rsa-sha256 header.s=pp1 header.b=R26AJgX1; dkim-atps=neutral Received: from mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com [148.163.156.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by lists.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CmQrk222RzDr5s for ; Thu, 3 Dec 2020 04:27:18 +1100 (AEDT) Received: from pps.filterd (m0098404.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B2HA6YO038590; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 12:27:16 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ibm.com; h=subject : to : cc : references : from : message-id : date : mime-version : in-reply-to : content-type : content-transfer-encoding; s=pp1; bh=99mJ7FcmF7cE5LN73+rIbRWuUGG4atdwg82i/zSrrhk=; b=R26AJgX1VolGu5VKHvdcu2p7FVj2wqD58WPqw2tGZ7iil5bVfVa2+37H0u02R5TI/TMy oSeX0Va77RmYq7S4jzTdCWxIrUt6IlH29UMsTbuDonfZO92oVUD+1BSQOIdwnR3L2pzi cZiyK9Gnh800zqrOZdifY63jDM1YnNRPRo8Xpy62oyXvOSKAx+f10d54HCC6Sm7aS4Xs EGv+NLouk9gSrisSs72swsDltVLLBgHR1DLjuHe8RGZ7VV7gkBwyOfF2lAPlTeH7DKuO vOFyhuXXob1OOH1Q1seCJIuCtVlbVKZBHSbUIus5sr/i9VPl8muQ5lIZDLhHM3++Fsnw sg== Received: from ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (a.bd.3ea9.ip4.static.sl-reverse.com [169.62.189.10]) by mx0a-001b2d01.pphosted.com with ESMTP id 356ceu6649-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 12:27:15 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (ppma02dal.us.ibm.com [127.0.0.1]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com (8.16.0.42/8.16.0.42) with SMTP id 0B2HLVC8005047; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:27:14 GMT Received: from b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.198.28]) by ppma02dal.us.ibm.com with ESMTP id 3569xuawra-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 02 Dec 2020 17:27:14 +0000 Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com [9.57.199.109]) by b01cxnp23033.gho.pok.ibm.com (8.14.9/8.14.9/NCO v10.0) with ESMTP id 0B2HRDNe11469410 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:27:14 GMT Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE4A6112064; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:27:13 +0000 (GMT) Received: from b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (unknown [127.0.0.1]) by IMSVA (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21F78112061; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:27:12 +0000 (GMT) Received: from oc6857751186.ibm.com (unknown [9.65.215.138]) by b01ledav004.gho.pok.ibm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP; Wed, 2 Dec 2020 17:27:11 +0000 (GMT) Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 01/17] ibmvfc: add vhost fields and defaults for MQ enablement To: Brian King , james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com References: <20201202005329.4538-1-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> <20201202005329.4538-2-tyreld@linux.ibm.com> From: Tyrel Datwyler Message-ID: <38903a4f-9253-0b4b-6f67-af78ec86175f@linux.ibm.com> Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 09:27:11 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.12.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-TM-AS-GCONF: 00 X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:6.0.312, 18.0.737 definitions=2020-12-02_10:2020-11-30, 2020-12-02 signatures=0 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_notspam policy=outbound score=0 priorityscore=1501 mlxscore=0 suspectscore=0 bulkscore=0 phishscore=0 adultscore=0 malwarescore=0 spamscore=0 lowpriorityscore=0 clxscore=1015 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.12.0-2009150000 definitions=main-2012020100 X-BeenThere: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux on PowerPC Developers Mail List List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: brking@linux.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Errors-To: linuxppc-dev-bounces+linuxppc-dev=archiver.kernel.org@lists.ozlabs.org Sender: "Linuxppc-dev" On 12/2/20 7:14 AM, Brian King wrote: > On 12/1/20 6:53 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote: >> Introduce several new vhost fields for managing MQ state of the adapter >> as well as initial defaults for MQ enablement. >> >> Signed-off-by: Tyrel Datwyler >> --- >> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 9 ++++++++- >> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h | 13 +++++++++++-- >> 2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c >> index 42e4d35e0d35..f1d677a7423d 100644 >> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c >> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c >> @@ -5161,12 +5161,13 @@ static int ibmvfc_probe(struct vio_dev *vdev, const struct vio_device_id *id) >> } >> >> shost->transportt = ibmvfc_transport_template; >> - shost->can_queue = max_requests; >> + shost->can_queue = (max_requests / IBMVFC_SCSI_HW_QUEUES); > > This doesn't look right. can_queue is the SCSI host queue depth, not the MQ queue depth. Our max_requests is the total number commands allowed across all queues. From what I understand is can_queue is the total number of commands in flight allowed for each hw queue. /* * In scsi-mq mode, the number of hardware queues supported by the LLD. * * Note: it is assumed that each hardware queue has a queue depth of * can_queue. In other words, the total queue depth per host * is nr_hw_queues * can_queue. However, for when host_tagset is set, * the total queue depth is can_queue. */ We currently don't use the host wide shared tagset. -Tyrel > >> shost->max_lun = max_lun; >> shost->max_id = max_targets; >> shost->max_sectors = IBMVFC_MAX_SECTORS; >> shost->max_cmd_len = IBMVFC_MAX_CDB_LEN; >> shost->unique_id = shost->host_no; >> + shost->nr_hw_queues = IBMVFC_SCSI_HW_QUEUES; >> >> vhost = shost_priv(shost); >> INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vhost->sent); > > >