linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Re: the great state of the linuxppc-dev community
@ 2000-02-09  7:01 jeramy b smith
  2000-02-09 20:43 ` Jason Haas
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: jeramy b smith @ 2000-02-09  7:01 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Dan Bethe, linuxppc-dev


I agree with some of what Dan says although I would choose different words and
a different focus.

Development is not so much 'splintered' as it just has no 'center.' If you
read the history of the ppc sources, you'll see that this is how it has always
been. BUT, development is become more centralized out of mere evolution. For
instance, here is a piece of 'voodoo' known only to a handful; the #mklinux
channel on EFNet usually has 2 or more kernel developers on. Today I
discovered that a kernel couldn't be built with having an asm-m68k include
directory in your source tree. Instead of submitting a patch full of ifdefs to
this mailing list, I just told Ben who was there and he added it to his tree.
Eventually, this will wind up in Paul's.

Sure, things are not as centralized as they could be. There is no
linuxppc-kernel mailing list so that all new patches can be easily reviewed by
peers and announcement for to-do lists can be posted. I'll set one up on my
dedicated majordomo server but this would depend on whether the maintainers
would go for it. In my opinion, to-do lists are the most needed thing. Many
kernel development tasks such as cleaning up messy code and documentation
could be handled by some of the wanna-be hackers (like me) while people like
Ani, Ben, Paul, Cort, and Geert are writing drivers and merging new features.
To-do lists would also give people who want to get in on the deeper
development process an idea where they can start.

Linux/PPC just needs a bit of small, easy to implement, non-annoying, project
management. The maintainers do an awesome job based on the amount of help/time
available but a little bit of centralization of communication could increase
the amount of volunteers doing meaningful work.


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: the great state of the linuxppc-dev community
  2000-02-09  7:01 the great state of the linuxppc-dev community jeramy b smith
@ 2000-02-09 20:43 ` Jason Haas
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Jason Haas @ 2000-02-09 20:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: linuxppc-dev


FWIW, I think we're really close to being able to jettison linuxppc.org into the
world at large.

- Most of the LinuxPPC.com-specific info has been removed.
- All known distros are now represented, sorted by alpha.
- A new design is being worked on for the main page, which is so very very 1996
in terms of web design.

I think we'll be ready to really set it on its own soon, probably next month.
Apparently Dan Bethe has big plans for it. ;-)

-- Jason

(really really hating being in the Mac OS)


** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2000-02-09 20:43 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-02-09  7:01 the great state of the linuxppc-dev community jeramy b smith
2000-02-09 20:43 ` Jason Haas

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).