From: Michel Dänzer <michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch>
To: Michael Schmitz <schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Cc: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>,
Kostas Gewrgiou <gewrgiou@imbc.gr>,
linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work onppcwithr128
Date: Sun, 12 Mar 2000 15:52:51 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38CBAF43.B9F7D50@iiic.ethz.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.10.10003111521590.14494-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de
Michael Schmitz wrote:
> I'll try that. But the results I get with X -probeonly are more than
> confusing. After I tosses out most of the driver modules,
Which drivers? Only r128, fbdev and glint are known to be working on PPC
AFAIK.
> the probe runs once or twice, and gets sporadic SIGILL the rest of the time.
> To the extent of not succeeding at all for the rest of the day. Or
> succeeding only from the console but not from a slogin session (signal 4 in
> the slogin session consistently). The signal happens apparently at different
> times during X startup - while loading the dbe module, after loading the
> fbdevhw module.
This is a known bug in the server's cache flush code. There is a fix worked
out by Kostas Gewrgiou and Kevin Hendricks which unfortunately hasn't made it
into 4.0.
> The chip was detected on the PCI bus - what's the BusID supposed to do in
> this situation? Keep X from probing the other PCI devices?
> OK, tried to feed it the BusID (0:17:0 as reported by the probe). Results:
> a beep, and the warnings 'invalid mem allocation' and 'invalid IO
> allocation'. The IO range smells like a port address range, is that
> remapped by the PCI bridge? lspci reports the IO range as disabled. I'll
> look into Geerts description of the Mach64 memory layout to figure out
> what aperture X tries to use here.
Are you trying to use the driver for Mach64?
Try the fbdev driver with the BusID. (Mach is only minimally accelerated ATM
anyway)
Michel
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-12 14:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.21.0003041753480.1870-100000@idd-01.imbc.gr>
2000-03-04 18:55 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwith r128 Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-05 13:42 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-03-05 16:43 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-05 16:58 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-05 21:04 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-05 21:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-03-05 22:25 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-06 6:54 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-03-09 3:11 ` Kevin Hendricks
[not found] ` <38C7A016.8C2ED4C8@iiic.ethz.ch>
[not found] ` <v03110701b562ab7246aa@[129.100.29.243]>
2000-03-10 15:33 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwithr128 Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-10 17:25 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-10 18:17 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-03-10 19:21 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-10 23:54 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on ppcwithr128 Michel Dänzer
2000-03-11 14:50 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-12 14:52 ` Michel Dänzer [this message]
2000-03-10 19:43 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwithr128 David A. Gatwood
2000-03-11 14:38 ` Help! Getting aty128fb.c to work with newest sawtooth machines Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-13 9:19 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-14 1:12 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work on pp cwith r128 Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-09 2:41 ` Kevin Hendricks
2000-03-09 11:04 ` Gabriel Paubert
[not found] <Pine.LNX.4.10.10003131026030.29249-100000@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
2000-03-13 12:10 ` patch to get latest XFree 4.0 snapshot (xf3918) to work onppcwithr128 Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-13 13:05 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-03-13 16:24 ` Kostas Gewrgiou
2000-03-13 17:02 ` Michael Schmitz
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=38CBAF43.B9F7D50@iiic.ethz.ch \
--to=michdaen@iiic.ethz.ch \
--cc=gewrgiou@imbc.gr \
--cc=khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=schmitz@opal.biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).