* CONFIG_6xx and CONFIG_82xx?
@ 2000-04-21 21:00 Gessner, Matt
2000-04-22 17:15 ` Dan Malek
0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gessner, Matt @ 2000-04-21 21:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: 'Linux PPC'
Hi,
I tried building with CONFIG_6xx defined and hit the
#error in kernel.c. I'm really trying to configure for an
8260, but I think it's in the works.
Is anyone on the list currently working on something
like this?
TIA
Matt Gessner
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
* Re: CONFIG_6xx and CONFIG_82xx?
2000-04-21 21:00 CONFIG_6xx and CONFIG_82xx? Gessner, Matt
@ 2000-04-22 17:15 ` Dan Malek
0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dan Malek @ 2000-04-22 17:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gessner, Matt; +Cc: 'Linux PPC'
"Gessner, Matt" wrote:
> .... I'm really trying to configure for an
> 8260, but I think it's in the works.
Not quite ready yet. One of my projects for the weekend. I have it
working in an older 2.3 kernel and I am checking it all into 2.3.99
right now.
-- Dan
** Sent via the linuxppc-embedded mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2000-04-22 17:15 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2000-04-21 21:00 CONFIG_6xx and CONFIG_82xx? Gessner, Matt
2000-04-22 17:15 ` Dan Malek
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).