From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <3904CAD9.17C1AA93@pandora.be> Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 18:29:46 -0400 From: Daniel Gonzalez MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Dunlap, Randy" CC: Matthew Dharm , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, linux-usb@suse.com Subject: Re: [linux-usb] Close to a solution. Please help ! References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Hi Randy, Strange enough my /etc/conf.modules is empty. No wonder that the modules are not automatically loaded ( I have to do it by hand )Any idea of what should I do to recreate that file ? BTW, no sd_mod module present in my system ... "Dunlap, Randy" wrote: > Hi Daniel, > > I don't see anything that is obviously wrong in the > linux/.config file. > > The recent advice from Joseph Fannin looks good. > Have you tried it? (except change: > alias char-major-8 sd_mod > to > alias block-major-8 sd_mod > ) > > Give us a list of modules that are loaded when you connect > the Zip drive. > > Switching to the main linux tree is likely just to give > you/us a different set of problems, but I'm just guessing > that based on Brad Hards's comments. > > For USB source file comparisons, all of my 2.3.99-pre6-5 > unzipped .c files are dated between Mar. 10 and Apr. 21, 2000. > None from the Jan.-Feb. timeframe as you listed. > There have been beaucoups changes in this time, especially > to the usb-storage driver. > > ~Randy > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Daniel Gonzalez [mailto:daniel.gonzalez@pandora.be] > > Sent: Monday, April 24, 2000 2:54 PM > > To: Dunlap, Randy > > Cc: Matthew Dharm; Sheldon Easterbrook; > > linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org; > > linux-usb@suse.com > > Subject: Re: [linux-usb] Close to a solution. Please help ! > > > > > > Well. The sources I have are taken from linuxcare (I > > think that is Paul's tree, > > > > isn't?). I am using the devel tree, since I heard that > > was performing better for the USB subsystem. > > > > > > > > > I'm still confused about what version of the kernel code this is. > > > > > > The Linux boot message says 2.3.99-pre6, but the USB code is clearly > > > MUCH earlier than that. > > > Could you explain a little of how you came by this code? > > > I don't want the complete history, just enough to help us > > > understand what you are trying to use here. > > > > > > > I am using a development tree targeted for the PowerPC > > community. I suppose this code > > is periodically merged with the main linux tree, but I do not > > know how they put together > > the sources. Maybe I should use the main linux tree ? > > > > The usb sources are: > > > > [root@dhcp-213-224-12-204 usb]# grep \$Id /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/* > > 2>/dev/nul > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/dabusb.c: * $Id: dabusb.c,v 1.45 > > 2000/01/31 > > 10:23:44 fliegl Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/devices.c: * $Id: devices.c,v 1.5 > > 2000/01/11 > > 13:58:21 tom Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/devio.c: * $Id: devio.c,v 1.7 > > 2000/02/01 17:28:48 > > fliegl Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/drivers.c: * $Id: drivers.c,v 1.3 > > 2000/01/11 > > 13:58:24 tom Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/inode.c: * $Id: inode.c,v 1.3 > > 2000/01/11 13:58:25 > > tom Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/plusb.c: * $Id: plusb.c,v 1.18 > > 2000/02/14 10:38:58 > > fliegl Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/usb-uhci.c: * $Id: usb-uhci.c,v > > 1.228 2000/04/02 > > 19:55:51 acher Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/usb-uhci.h: $Id: usb-uhci.h,v > > 1.54 2000/04/02 > > 19:55:53 acher Exp $ > > /usr/src/linux/drivers/usb/usb.c: * $Id: usb.c,v 1.53 > > 2000/01/14 16:19:09 acher > > Exp $ ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/