From: Steven Hanley <sjh@wibble.net>
To: Sergio Brandano <sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk>,
Linux PPC Dev <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: Re: PMUD vs APM
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 21:04:13 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <392BB72D.78EBA12A@wibble.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200005240959.KAA18934@copper.dcs.qmw.ac.uk
> It would be a good thing, however, to have a unified monitoring
> system despite the hardware. I mean Intels are based on apm, PPCs are
> based on pmu, but do applications need to know it?
hopefully I am not rambling or overly much off topic here...
Agreed, common user space interfaqces so any tools in userspce can
access and use the features. Stephen Rothwell is the APM maintainer
(kernel space) and he works in the same office as Paul, I have asked
Stpehen in the past about any similarities between APM and power book
powersaving interfaces and he has said it is completely different, this
is undersatrandable. Paul of course has a verry good power management
system set up on his laptop (lombard ?) of course.
But if someone were to sit down and work out what power management is
all about and some way of displaying a common extensible interface from
kernel to user space it would be good. Thus we could have ACPI (or
whatever the new one is called) and APM and PMUD code in the kernel
providing interfaces any tools can work with. What they do in kernel
space is their business (the completely different parts Stpehen
mentioned)
It would need to be extensible and standardised, so say some new thing
becomes available in power management tools can support it easily and
not break etc etc. ie. be able to present all capabilites and new
capabilities as they appear etc etc. I am sure people understand the
ideas, anyway I agree a common user space interface would be a good
thing. I personally dont have a laptop (or currently spare time <g>,
then who has any of that?) and I dont even know if my 7220/200 has power
management hardware in it. Though my dual pII/350 I know has both APM
and ACPI support, though I have never used either, as APM is undefined
on SMP (well apart from the power off on shutdown trick, and even that
took a while to get working) and I have yet to see a need to try to use
ACPI on the dual box.
See You
Steve
--
sjh@wibble.net http://wibble.net/~sjh/
Look Up In The Sky
Is it a bird? No
Is it a plane? No
Is it a small blue banana?
YES
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-24 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 81+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-16 7:23 Pismo status Chris Leishman
2000-05-16 8:46 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-05-16 14:15 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-16 14:13 ` Chris Leishman
2000-05-16 19:51 ` Tim Wojtulewicz
2000-05-17 9:03 ` Albrecht Dre_
2000-05-17 10:54 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-17 12:08 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-18 5:15 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-05-18 9:13 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-18 14:35 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-18 15:33 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-18 14:47 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-18 15:49 ` Sergio Brandano
[not found] ` <20000519094029.A16145@lambda.u-strasbg.fr>
2000-05-19 12:30 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-19 19:42 ` Worth
2000-05-20 9:51 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-20 11:53 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-05-21 5:52 ` David A. Gatwood
2000-05-22 13:32 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-22 14:44 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-22 13:54 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-22 15:01 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-22 14:13 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-22 15:16 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-22 14:33 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-22 15:41 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-22 15:48 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-05-22 16:46 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-22 17:08 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-23 17:48 ` Debian pmud package available Michael Schmitz
2000-05-23 18:59 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-23 18:09 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-24 7:11 ` Stephan Leemburg
2000-05-24 7:31 ` PMUD vs APM Joseph Garcia
2000-05-24 11:00 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-24 10:13 ` Joseph Garcia
2000-05-24 11:04 ` Steven Hanley [this message]
2000-05-24 9:18 ` Debian pmud package available Michael Schmitz
2000-05-24 20:23 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-25 12:04 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-05-25 20:25 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-26 7:58 ` Francois Felix Ingrand
2000-05-26 9:25 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-28 1:58 ` Robert Thompson
2000-05-28 12:03 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-28 14:35 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-05-28 14:42 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-05-30 6:55 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-05-30 8:57 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-05-30 20:11 ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-05-31 13:20 ` Francois Felix Ingrand
2000-05-31 19:01 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-06-01 7:45 ` Francois Felix Ingrand
2000-06-01 8:53 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-06-06 18:44 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-06-06 19:12 ` Joseph Garcia
2000-06-06 19:42 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-06-06 20:00 ` Pismo battery support (was 'Re: Debian pmud package available') Joseph Garcia
2000-06-06 20:13 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-06-07 7:08 ` Stephan Leemburg
2000-06-07 7:55 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-06-06 20:09 ` Debian pmud package available Michel Dänzer
2000-06-07 13:50 ` Francois Felix Ingrand
2000-05-24 0:31 ` Wilhelm Fitzpatrick
2000-05-24 7:30 ` Stephan Leemburg
2000-05-21 21:01 ` Pismo status Timothy A. Seufert
2000-05-21 21:28 ` Rawhide SRPMS ian reinhart geiser
2000-05-22 5:17 ` Pismo status Ethan Benson
2000-05-22 8:58 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-05-22 21:34 ` David A. Gatwood
2000-05-20 16:23 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-21 6:10 ` David A. Gatwood
2000-05-18 20:06 ` Worth
2000-05-18 14:33 ` Sven LUTHER
2000-05-19 5:40 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-05-18 14:48 ` Tim Wojtulewicz
2000-05-19 5:53 ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-05-17 15:04 ` Tim Wojtulewicz
2000-05-17 16:15 ` Sergio Brandano
2000-05-17 17:36 ` Worth
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=392BB72D.78EBA12A@wibble.net \
--to=sjh@wibble.net \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=sb@dcs.qmw.ac.uk \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).