linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andreas Tobler <toa@pop.agri.ch>
To: "Timothy A. Seufert" <tas@mindspring.com>
Cc: Martin Costabel <costabel@wanadoo.fr>,
	Linux/PPC Development <linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org>
Subject: ide-speed was Re: Interrupt hick ups
Date: Fri, 16 Jun 2000 10:35:19 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <3949E6C7.877E7655@pop.agri.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: v04220804b56f910f22ca@[10.0.0.42]


"Timothy A. Seufert" wrote:
>
> At 9:56 AM +0200 6/16/00, Martin Costabel wrote:
> >What is gone too, unfortunately, is the phenomenal IDE speed
> >improvement. In late 2.3.99/early 2.4.0-test1, I had a "hdparm
> >-t"-measured throughput more than 3 times as high (almost 6MB/sec,
> >sometimes more) as with 2.2.x (1.90MB/sec). It diminished in -ac15
> >(3.25MB/sec), and in -ac16 it is almost back down (2.30MB/sec) to the
> >2.2.x values.
>
> Have you made sure your HD is set up for DMA, etc.?  For example, do
> "hdparm -d1 -u1 -m16 -p4 /dev/hda" and then run the -t throughput
> test.  (Use the man pages to make sure those are sane options, that's
> all from memory.)
>
> I remember similar fluctuation in 2.2.x as automatic negotiation of
> DMA and so forth was first put in then taken out of the IDE driver.
>
> Also, to make sure buffers get flushed before a test (for repeatable
> results) you should do hdparm -Tt, not just hdparm -t.

Aha, just made a test and saw the same as Martin. Now with the hint from
Tim I get back to 6.30MB/s on ac19
On 2.2.16 it is still 6.xMB/s.
So now the question is for me what does the kernel parameter
hda=autotune do?
Do I always have to set this line by 'hand'(script) "hdparm -d1 -u1 -m16
-p4 /dev/hda"?

Thanks
Andreas

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-06-16  8:35 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-06-13 21:19 Interrupt hick ups Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-06-14 20:40 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-06-16  7:56   ` Martin Costabel
2000-06-16  8:12     ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-06-16  8:35       ` Andreas Tobler [this message]
2000-06-16 17:27       ` Martin Costabel

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=3949E6C7.877E7655@pop.agri.ch \
    --to=toa@pop.agri.ch \
    --cc=costabel@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=tas@mindspring.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).