linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@amulet.co.jp>
To: arcane@verinet.com
Cc: yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com,
	linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Need for Cross Platform Updates Distribution
Date: Mon, 19 Jun 2000 17:19:27 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <394DD78F.AD49931@amulet.co.jp> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Pine.LNX.4.10.10006190106010.30352-100000@bamboo.verinet.com


Bryan Stillwell wrote:
>
> I've never used suse personally, but I've tried using a
> suse rpm witha redhat installation and it just screwed everything up.

I look at that as trying to install an OS/2 binary onto a Windows box
(and then complaining that it doesn't work).

> Why are the
> Linux distro companies fighting over something as simple as packaging
> format?

The package format is the same (rpm), it's the contents that differ. And
I really don't see a fight - everyone seems quite happy to let the
others do what they want.

> Also, what's this about suse using /opt for kde and gnome? sn't
> /opt in the filesystem standard for commercial software only?

It all depends on what "standard" you're using.

> I guess my main question for writing this message is will the various
> distros (Yellowdog, linuxppc, suse, etc.) ever get package compatibility
> where I can use a rpm from suse and install it on a yellowdog box?  or
> will Debian be the best choice for me in the near/distant future for any
> platform?

The distributions all want to make their stuff the best. And since
people have different opinions on what's best, distributions differ.
That's the way it goes.

I should also note that Debian packages also don't work well with other
distributions.

-Hollis

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-06-19  8:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <394D2013.AAD184AB@golden.net>
2000-06-19  5:57 ` Need for Cross Platform Updates Distribution Olaf Hering
2000-06-19  7:33   ` Bryan Stillwell
2000-06-19  8:03     ` Steven Hanley
2000-06-19  8:19     ` Hollis Blanchard [this message]
2000-06-19  8:35       ` Michel Dänzer
2000-06-19  8:58         ` Olaf Hering
2000-06-19  9:03         ` Hollis Blanchard
2000-06-19  9:13           ` Michel Dänzer
2000-06-18 15:41 hendricks

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=394DD78F.AD49931@amulet.co.jp \
    --to=hollis@amulet.co.jp \
    --cc=arcane@verinet.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=yellowdog-general@lists.yellowdoglinux.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).