linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Clausen <clausen@gnu.org>
To: Hollis Blanchard <hollis@amulet.co.jp>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, GNU Parted list <parted@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: GNU Parted, linuxppc support coming :-)
Date: Wed, 05 Jul 2000 09:07:49 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <39626E45.E0496869@gnu.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 39632512.1953DBAA@amulet.co.jp


Hollis Blanchard wrote:
>
> Andrew Clausen wrote:
> >
> > I'm trying to support the Mac partition map, but I'll need some help,
> > since I don't have a PowerPC :-(
>
> Just about everything you need is at
> http://developer.apple.com/techpubs/mac/Devices/Devices-121.html#HEADING121-50

Yeah, I've read it... :-)

> At least, I know that myself and a few other people have been able to
> code based off of that.

Yep.

> > Could someone send me their partition map?  You can get this with:
> >
> >         # dd if=/dev/hda bs=512 count=MAP-SIZE | gzip | map.gz
> >
> > If you don't know how big your partition map (+1 for driver block) is,
> > then 64 should do (?).  (What's a reasonable size for a partition
> > map?)
>
> I forget, but I don't think *anyone* has more than 20 (on most Macs, the
> first 7 contain drivers etc), so 20 x sizeof(partition) (see above URL).

Each partition gets one block (yes?).  So thats 20 * 512?
(From comments in various programs, most disks have 512 byte blocks...)

> > Note: I'm not adding HFS support at this stage - it's a LOT of work.
> > So you'll be able to resize ext2 partitions in the near future, but
> > not HFS partitions :-/  Unless there are some volunteers...
>
> There seems to be a shortage of HFS folks these days. :) But ext2
> resizing sounds very cool.

Excuse my ignorance... what FS's do people usually use with MacOS?
HFS/HFS+?

(Is the point "no-one uses MacOS", or "no-one's hacking on HFS
in Linux"?)

> P.S. Can't get you a real map right now, but email me later if you want
> it.

That would be useful, thanks :-)

Andrew Clausen

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

  reply	other threads:[~2000-07-04 23:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-07-04 21:44 GNU Parted, linuxppc support coming :-) Andrew Clausen
2000-07-05 12:07 ` Hollis Blanchard
2000-07-04 23:07   ` Andrew Clausen [this message]
2000-07-05 20:01     ` Daniel Jacobowitz
2000-07-06  5:37       ` Michel Lanners
2000-07-08  5:07         ` Ethan Benson
2000-07-08  8:58           ` Timothy A. Seufert
2000-07-10 22:19             ` Michel Lanners
2000-07-05 12:26   ` Michel Dänzer
2000-07-04 23:06     ` Andrew Clausen
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-07-05 14:49 Iain Sandoe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=39626E45.E0496869@gnu.org \
    --to=clausen@gnu.org \
    --cc=hollis@amulet.co.jp \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    --cc=parted@gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).