From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Message-ID: <396F6725.417473B@wanadoo.fr> Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2000 21:16:53 +0200 From: Martin Costabel MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Franz Sirl CC: Iain Sandoe , linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org Subject: Re: Upgraded utils... References: <200007141730.SAA17219@hyperion.valhalla.net> <4.3.2.7.2.20000714210226.039b37f0@mail.munich.netsurf.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org List-Id: Franz Sirl wrote: > > At 20:54 14.07.00, Martin Costabel wrote: > >Could be /sbin/hwclock is now a binary that was compiled with > >util-linux. This doesn't mean it works, though. Better put the old fake > >hwclock shell script there ("/sbin/clock -s"). Or is one now supposed to > >create /dev/rtc and use it as on any other architecture? > > Yes! That's why I did CONFIG_PPC_RTC, it's such simple code, but it helps a > lot to bring us in line with the other architectures. Yes, sorry I forgot, I have actually already used this, back in the good old days when I could still boot 2.4.0-testX. But does this actually work with the hwclock program from standard RedHat util-linux? -- Martin ** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/