From: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
To: "Kevin B. Hendricks" <khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: diff to tonight's kaffe cvs tree to work on ppc
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2000 14:31:42 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <397DA4CE.D79D06AA@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 397D9E3B.51E31B0E@ivey.uwo.ca
"Kevin B. Hendricks" wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> Good to hear from you again!
Hi Kevin!
Good to see you too!
> > This is only true as far as the 64 bit systems running on the 32 bit kernel,
> > which is all there is at the moment.
>
> I am confused. Which of the following is true on a 64 bit system running on a
> 32 bit kernel?
>
> A). sizeof(unsigned int) > sizeof(void *)
>
> or
>
> B). sizeof(unsigned int) < sizeof(void *)
B is true. On the 64 bit kernel int is 32, long is 64, void * is 64.
> If A) is true, then my stack alignment macro will still work. If B) is true, I
> am in trouble.
I wouldn't say you are in trouble. We're going to try to put in 32 bit binary
compatibility so current 32 bit apps should run on the 64 bit kernel without a
recompile. I think there's only potential trouble for someone who would
recompile Kaffe for the 64 bit kernel... but that doesn't exactly quite exist
yet...
> > Work has started on the 64 bit PowerPC Linux kernel, if Kaffe is compiled as a
> > 64 bit app for that kernel then sizeof(unsigned long) = sizeof(void *) will be
> > true. Certainly not a big deal at this stage, but thought you'd be interested
> > none the less.
>
> Sounds good! When IBM is ready to start giving 64bit systems to help
> developers, let me know! ;-)
Actually this sort of thing is starting to happen. While I can't promise
machines, it is possible to get a few out there here and there....
Regards,
Tom
--
Tom Gall - PowerPC Linux Team "Where's the ka-boom? There was
Linux Technology Center supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558 -- Marvin Martian
(h) tgall@uswest.net
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-25 14:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200007250345.VAA22028@faith.cs.utah.edu>
2000-07-25 13:13 ` diff to tonight's kaffe cvs tree to work on ppc Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-07-25 13:33 ` tom_gall
2000-07-25 14:03 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-07-25 14:31 ` tom_gall [this message]
2000-07-25 17:22 ` Kevin B. Hendricks
2000-07-25 18:42 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-07-25 2:42 Kevin B. Hendricks
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=397DA4CE.D79D06AA@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=khendricks@ivey.uwo.ca \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).