From: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
To: Martin Costabel <costabel@wanadoo.fr>
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org, dwayne@us.ibm.com
Subject: Re: modprobe and exec format error
Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2000 17:46:30 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39807576.3F77B13A@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 397F6686.20E2D953@wanadoo.fr
Hi Martin,
Martin Costabel wrote:
>
> tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com wrote:
> >
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Here's a strange one...
> >
> > I'm bringing up a 2.4.0-testX kernel (Paul's latest PMac tree) and the kernel
> > does come up quite a ways (tho how far is a bit hard to tell as things scroll by
> > and scroll lock doesn't work)
>
> If you compile MagicSysRq support in, you can stop scrolling by
> "SysRq-0" (that is F13 + zero).
>
> > I get the following repeated item on my screen ... so imagine this line times N
> >
> > /sbin/modprobe -s -k binfmt_4c46 errno=8
> >
> > Well errno 8 is Exec format error as I recall... time to upgrade modutils?
> >
> > Anyone with any suggestions or have seen this one before?
>
> Yeah, seen this before:
> http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-dev/200007/msg00327.html
> and my solution:
> http://lists.linuxppc.org/listarcs/linuxppc-dev/200007/msg00345.html
Thanks much for the pointers.
I am experiencing this with Cort's current development kernel tree. Based on the
previous posting you had in theory all I needed to do was just grab a fresh
kernel which I did this morning. The same problem surfaced. So something is
definately wrong with the Cort's 2.4.0-test5 tree.
I took a gander at elf.h. The only change I see is
2.3.99-pre9
#define elf_check_arch(x) ((x) == EM_PPC)
2.4.0-test5-Cort
#define elf_check_arch(x) ((x)->e_machine == EM_PPC)
This appearantly is used 3 times fs/binfmt_elf.c
2.3.99-pre9
if (!elf_check_arch(interp_elf_ex->e_machine))
2.4.0-test5-Cort
if (!elf_check_arch(&elf_ex))
So while the code changed it would appear to be consistant at least....
Guess I'll have to keep digging!
> I'm curious what your reason was for getting this.
Me too!
Regards,
Tom
--
Tom Gall - PowerPC Linux Team "Where's the ka-boom? There was
Linux Technology Center supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558 -- Marvin Martian
(h) tgall@uswest.net
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-07-27 17:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-07-26 22:06 modprobe and exec format error tom_gall
2000-07-26 22:30 ` Martin Costabel
2000-07-27 17:46 ` tom_gall [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=39807576.3F77B13A@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=costabel@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=dwayne@us.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).