From: Martin Costabel <costabel@wanadoo.fr>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Cc: Iain Sandoe <iain@sandoe.co.uk>
Subject: Re: rtc again...
Date: Thu, 03 Aug 2000 11:00:55 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <398934C7.663E6BD9@wanadoo.fr> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200008022249.XAA32651@hyperion.valhalla.net
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 941 bytes --]
Iain Sandoe wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> under 2.2.17pre15ben1
>
> rtc does not give me the right answer when built in - what am I doing wrong?
>
> It won't build load as a module right now 'cos I forgot to check ppc_ksyms
> before doing the build :-( .... (I remembered for 2.4.0).
>
> under 2.4.0-test5 it seems to be fine as a module (haven't tried built in).
I am using it as module both for 2.2.17-bk and for 2.4.0-test5. They
don't give the same time, and I think it is the one in 2.4.0 that is
right. I am at GMT+2:00, and the time in 2.2.17 is 2 hours early. When I
change /etc/sysconfig/clock from "UTC=false" to "UTC=true", both times
shift by 2 hours, but the discrepancy remains.
The following patch for bitkeeper linuxppc_2_2 fixes this problem for
me. It brings 2.2.17pre13 in line with 2.4.0-test5 (and MacOS). I cannot
test the VIAPMU part, so maybe there the offset is necessary, but for
the VIACUDA part, it seems wrong.
--
Martin
[-- Attachment #2: pmac_time.patch --]
[-- Type: text/plain, Size: 1027 bytes --]
--- arch/ppc/kernel/pmac_time.c~ Mon Jun 26 09:09:05 2000
+++ arch/ppc/kernel/pmac_time.c Thu Aug 3 09:22:36 2000
@@ -78,7 +78,6 @@
unsigned long pmac_get_rtc_time(void)
{
struct adb_request req;
- int offset = sys_tz.tz_minuteswest * 60;
/* Get the time from the RTC */
if (adb_controller == 0)
@@ -95,7 +94,7 @@
printk(KERN_ERR "pmac_get_rtc_time: got %d byte reply\n",
req.reply_len);
return (req.reply[3] << 24) + (req.reply[4] << 16)
- + (req.reply[5] << 8) + req.reply[6] - RTC_OFFSET + offset;
+ + (req.reply[5] << 8) + req.reply[6] - RTC_OFFSET;
case ADB_VIAPMU:
if (pmu_request(&req, NULL, 1, PMU_READ_RTC) < 0) {
printk("pmac_read_rtc_time: pmu_request failed\n");
@@ -107,7 +106,7 @@
printk(KERN_ERR "pmac_get_rtc_time: got %d byte reply\n",
req.reply_len);
return (req.reply[1] << 24) + (req.reply[2] << 16)
- + (req.reply[3] << 8) + req.reply[4] - RTC_OFFSET + offset;
+ + (req.reply[3] << 8) + req.reply[4] - RTC_OFFSET;
default:
return 0;
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-03 9:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 64+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-02 22:48 rtc again Iain Sandoe
2000-08-03 9:00 ` Martin Costabel [this message]
2000-08-03 9:30 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-03 10:54 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-03 11:14 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-03 11:25 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-03 11:45 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-03 13:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-03 23:33 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-04 8:55 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-04 15:25 ` David Edelsohn
2000-08-04 15:50 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-07 12:33 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-07 11:51 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-07 13:18 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-07 15:14 ` David Edelsohn
2000-08-07 21:16 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-08 1:39 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-08-11 11:04 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-12 6:29 ` Paul Mackerras
2000-08-12 12:02 ` Ethan Benson
2000-08-12 12:51 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-12 18:46 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-09-17 16:47 ` dual G4 time issues Troy Benjegerdes
2000-08-14 12:59 ` rtc again Gabriel Paubert
[not found] ` <Pine.LNX.3.96LJ1.1b7.1000803182949.650C-100000@ofey.earthl ink.net>
2000-08-03 23:58 ` Franz Sirl
2000-08-04 0:33 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-04 12:54 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-04 13:40 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-04 13:20 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-08 11:20 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-03 10:31 ` Franz Sirl
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-08-03 9:41 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-03 9:56 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-03 10:13 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-03 11:58 ` Martin Costabel
2000-08-03 11:24 Iain Sandoe
[not found] <20000804205524.383@192.168.1.10>
2000-08-05 1:10 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-05 11:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-05 14:44 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-08 11:35 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-08 13:14 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-08 14:31 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-08 17:08 ` Michael Schmitz
2000-08-08 17:41 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-08 22:44 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-09 8:44 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-09 11:32 ` Martin Costabel
2000-08-09 13:50 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-09 15:25 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-09 16:54 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-09 17:04 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-09 23:12 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-09 23:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-09 22:13 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-09 22:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-10 3:08 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-10 0:00 ` William Blew
2000-08-09 14:26 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-09 0:55 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-09 8:48 ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-09 16:37 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-09 22:46 ` Gabriel Paubert
2000-08-09 14:24 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=398934C7.663E6BD9@wanadoo.fr \
--to=costabel@wanadoo.fr \
--cc=iain@sandoe.co.uk \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).