linuxppc-dev.lists.ozlabs.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Henry Worth <haworth@ncal.verio.com>
To: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: CDDA playback on Pismo (and other newer models)
Date: Sun, 06 Aug 2000 14:07:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <398DD37B.76A60CC7@ncal.verio.com> (raw)


References: <398A91CA.F8D3C489@student.ethz.ch>

Michel Dänzer wrote:
>
> Henry Worth wrote:
>
> > Rebuilding the kernel to use SCSI generic devices with IDE SCSI
> > emulation produced much better, even usable, results. At startup
> > there are still a couple of dropouts in the first few seconds,
> > but after that the playback is clean across multiple tracks (even
> > with a concurrent kernel compile). Piping cdparanoia to /dev/null
> > shows data rates of 187sectors/sec at all -S settings (and default).
> > From the the drive's spin-up sounds it seems to always be in
> > high-speed mode, but unlike the ATAPI driver, there is little
> > head movement noise.
>
> Does it also improve audio grabbing? With 2.2.15, both IDE and SCSI emulation
> almost killed the system...
>

Haven't seen any instability between the two interfaces
(2.2.17pre15-ben1, though I have had a number of sponstaneous
powerdowns when using the modem this weekend -- the PMU gets testy
when it doesn't get immediate attention, a problem with at least the
recent kernels -- haven't used the modem much with the early
Pismo capable kernels). With cdparanoia's error correction enabled
the SCSI interface is about 30-50% faster ripping tracks (~2-3X). With
the error correction disabled (-Z), both interfaces are the same
speed (~6X) and I get files that compare identically.

** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/

             reply	other threads:[~2000-08-06 21:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-08-06 21:07 Henry Worth [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-08-08 22:19 CDDA playback on Pismo (and other newer models) Henry Worth
2000-08-07 19:35 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-07 21:49 ` Henry Worth
2000-08-07  9:03 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-07 19:18 ` Henry Worth
2000-08-08  5:02   ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-08  7:01     ` Henry Worth
2000-08-06  9:38 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-06 13:26 ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-06 18:36 ` Henry Worth
2000-08-07  1:25   ` Takashi Oe
2000-08-07  5:02     ` Henry Worth
2000-08-04 13:05 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-04 12:57 Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-04  9:16 Iain Sandoe
2000-08-04 20:40 ` Henry Worth
2000-08-04 21:03   ` Benjamin Herrenschmidt
2000-08-06  8:09 ` Henry Worth
2000-08-04  5:18 Henry Worth
2000-08-04  9:50 ` Michel Dänzer
2000-08-04 15:56 ` Nelson Abramson
2000-08-04 19:45   ` Henry Worth

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=398DD37B.76A60CC7@ncal.verio.com \
    --to=haworth@ncal.verio.com \
    --cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).