From: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
To: mlan@cpu.lu
Cc: linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: PCI Buses
Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2000 23:16:14 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3999CF3E.561EB9C8@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200008151939.VAA00754@piglet.grunz.lu
Michel Lanners wrote:
>
> Hi Tom,
>
> On 15 Aug, this message from tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com echoed through cyberspace:
> > Just a stupid question here for those of you that have Mac hardware. Of all
> > the Mac hardware in existance right now, all Macs have at most one PCI bus
> > right?
Hi All,
I thank you much for the information. It took me a little bit but as I've been
looking at the PCI code I ran across the pmac PCI implementation which
definately has support for more than one PCI bus.
Where I'm coming from is getting the same thing working on IBM PowerPC
hardware for multiple pythons... fun fun fun...
Thanks again!
> Wrong :-)
>
> As has been said before, the 9x00 have two PCI busses on two identical
> bandit host bridges.
>
> Also, the 73/75/76/85/8600 have an additional bus called VCI by Apple,
> for accessing video in/out hardware, that behaves exactly like a PCI
> bus.
>
> Then, there are newer Macs, with those based on UniNorth having three
> PCI buses (AGP counted in).
It's definately interesting to hear that AGP is really just another PCI... or at
least treated that way. Being PCI/AGP stupid I appreciate the info... if it's
just another "PCI" of sorts, doesn't that have performance implications or is
that addressed really by the hardware implementation as apposed to the Linux
side of things?
Regards,
--
Tom Gall - PowerPC Linux Team "Where's the ka-boom? There was
Linux Technology Center supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558 -- Marvin Martian
(h) tgall@uswest.net
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-15 23:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-15 18:46 PCI Buses tom_gall
2000-08-15 19:14 ` Ani Joshi
2000-08-15 19:39 ` Michel Lanners
2000-08-15 23:16 ` tom_gall [this message]
2000-08-16 0:19 ` David Riley
2000-08-16 14:45 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2000-08-17 20:37 ` Matt Porter
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-08-15 18:52 jlquinn
2000-08-15 19:13 ` David Riley
2000-08-16 8:51 ` Gabriel Paubert
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=3999CF3E.561EB9C8@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
--cc=mlan@cpu.lu \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).