From: tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com
To: Graham Stoney <greyham@research.canon.com.au>
Cc: dan@netx4.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org
Subject: Re: Help with string.S
Date: Wed, 16 Aug 2000 16:22:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <399ABFBE.7278954E@vnet.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 399A4220.23A3B0F5@research.canon.com.au
Graham Stoney wrote:
>
> Casting our minds back to July, Dan Malek wrote:
> > OK, I think I am bailing out here. For some reason, if I remove
> > the 'dcbz' instructions on the MPC8xx processor the world is just
> > a better place. I don't know why, maybe because of some of the
> > TLB mapping, but I can't find a reason.
>
> What was the eventual outcome of this? I've been doing some 2.2.13
> kernel profiling on the 860, and __copy_tofrom_user is coming up as a
> hotspot.
> I tried dropping in the new improved version from
> linux-2.4.0-test7-pre4, and none of the 8xx mods are in there: it'l only
> work for 32 byte cache lines.
Graham,
That's not right. Which version of linux-2.4.0-x do you have? I'm sure Paul's,
Cort's and and I know for sure mine work for more than 32 byte cache lines
because 2 of my boxes have 128 byte cache lines and there's support in there for
it. (Paul wrote it... awesome stuff)
> I hacked it around and found the same as you: it won't work with the
> dcbz in there, and of course it doesn't run any faster than the old
> version without it. It's certainly getting more complex in there, and I
> see your point about whether the extra code will actually make it run
> any faster, especially on 8xx CPUs with small I-caches. I'd be keen to
> test whatever you've come up with to see if it's actually better than
> the old 2.2 code on 8xx CPUs.
This isn't the only spot too by the way ... glibc has the some problem.
> It sounds like a few people have at least had a shot at adding support
> for other than 32 byte cache lines, but none have propagated into the
> official kernels; how does that happen anyway?
By official are you meaning Linus' ?
Regards,
Tom
--
Tom Gall - PowerPC Linux Team "Where's the ka-boom? There was
Linux Technology Center supposed to be an earth
(w) tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com shattering ka-boom!"
(w) 507-253-4558 -- Marvin Martian
(h) tgall@uswest.net
http://oss.software.ibm.com/developerworks/opensource/linux
** Sent via the linuxppc-dev mail list. See http://lists.linuxppc.org/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-08-16 16:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-08-16 7:26 Help with string.S Graham Stoney
2000-08-16 16:22 ` tom_gall [this message]
2000-08-17 0:50 ` Graham Stoney
2000-08-17 19:28 ` Dan Malek
2000-08-18 2:10 ` Kernel TCP performance profiling (was Re: Help with string.S) Graham Stoney
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-07-08 22:57 Help with string.S Dan Malek
2000-07-08 23:57 ` Dan Malek
2000-07-10 6:14 ` Daniel Marmier
2000-07-10 15:17 ` David Edelsohn
2000-07-10 22:42 ` Dan Malek
2000-07-11 5:50 ` Daniel Marmier
2000-07-13 18:52 ` Dan Malek
2000-07-11 10:06 ` Adrian Cox
2000-07-11 15:53 ` Dan Malek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=399ABFBE.7278954E@vnet.ibm.com \
--to=tom_gall@vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=dan@netx4.com \
--cc=greyham@research.canon.com.au \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.linuxppc.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).